MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4361029077 · doi:10.1353/sch.2010.0014

Joining the Court: Pierce Butler

2010· article· en· W4361029077 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David J. Schroeder

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Supreme Court History · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSupreme courtLawHonorWifeEconomic JusticeWhite (mutation)Political scienceSociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Joining the Court: Pierce Butler DAVID SCHROEDER In a four-year span beginning in the summer of 1921, five new members took their seats on the Supreme Court, and three ofthose men—the middle three—arrived on the Bench within four months ofeach other. The first ofthe five was William Howard Taft, who, upon the death of Edward Douglass White, was named ChiefJustice of the United States by President Warren G. Harding. Minnesota corporate lawyer Pierce Butler wrote Taft a genial letter, extending his congratulations and best wishes. “1 felicitate you because it is an honor to any man to be chosen to that, the most exalted position in the world, and because no one who is qualified to discharge the duties of the office can fail to rejoice in attaining it. But the country is to be congratulated much more than you are.”1 Years earlier, former President Taft and attorney Butler both had been involved in the Grand Trunk Railroad arbitration, Taft as one of three arbitrators and Butler as one of two counsel for the Canadian government. Dur­ ing the proceedings, each man sized up the other professionally, and each was favorably impressed; the men developed a cordial per­ sonal relationship, staying at the same hotel and dining together several nights a week. As President, Taft had relished appointing men to the Supreme Court, and as Chief Justice he felt free to offer Harding and Attorney Gen­ eral Harry Daugherty advice on whom they should consider for a number of imminent vacancies. As the Court paused for its 1922 summer recess, the Chief believed it was not inconceivable that four seats might become vacant within a year or two. Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., was eighty-one and weakening physically. Joseph McKenna was seventy-nine and ailing mentally. At seventy-three, William Rufus Day had been quite ill earlier in the year and planned to retire soon. Mahlon Pit­ ney was only sixty-four, but he had suffered a stroke the previous year. In addition to the possibility of those vacancies came an actual and unexpected vacancy: John Hessin Clarke resigned to devote his energies to encouraging America’s entry into the League of Nations and “to read many books; to travel; and to serve my neighbors and some public causes.”2 Taft weighed in on Clarke’s resignation and replacement. Ifthis is true [Taft told Harding], and you have appointed Senator [George] Sutherland, I have no doubt he will be PIERCE BUTLER 145 promptly confirmed, and I congratu­ late you on the strength he will give to the Court. Clarke was a good fellow, but I differed with him a good deal in respect to his constitutional views, and I do not think he has been happy on the Court. He lost his sister dur­ ing this last year, who was his only relative, and it has seriously affected his peace of mind. I think, too, he is not in good health, nor do I think that the work on the Court was pleasing to him. It seems a curious circumstance, though I could explain it, that he and McReynolds are bitter enemies, due largely to McReynolds’ overbearing and insulting attitude toward Clarke.3 Sutherland’s appointment was anticipated: he had expressed to Harding his wish for a Court appointment, and Harding had all but promised him the first open seat.4 With Sutherland on the Bench and Day’s retirement imminent, Harding and Harry Daugherty were bombarded with suggestions. Very early, Harding had voiced his desire to appoint a Democrat; a second criterion, that the nominee be a Catholic, seemed reasonable since the only representatives ofthat faith were the late Chief Justice and McKenna, whose seat many expected to be vacant soon. Taft and his alter ego Justice Willis Van Devanter saw John W. Davis, a Democrat and Solicitor Gen­ eral in the Wilson administration, as the best candidate. Charles Hilles, personal secretary to President Taft and Republican party insider during the 1920s, suggested Victor Dowling (a member of the Appellate Division ofthe New York Supreme Court) and Martin Manton (a U.S. Circuit Court judge), both of whom met both criteria. Taft liked Dowling personallybut...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,926
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,281
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Supreme Court HistoryMême sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207