MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4361029625 · doi:10.1353/sch.2004.0017

Justices Seeking the Presidency

2004· article· en· W4361029625 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Allen Sharp

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Supreme Court History · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFederalistPresidencySupreme courtLawPresidential systemConstitutionEconomic JusticePolitical scienceSociologyPolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Justices Seeking the Presidency ALLEN SHARP The separation of powers in the Constitution of the United States has never been abso­ lute in either theory or practice. This is especially true in the quest for public office. At least one President, William Howard Taft, aspired to be a Supreme Court Justice. Several Supreme Court Justices seriously considered becoming President. These are a few stories about those ambitions. Flirting with the Federalists, 1812 In 1812, a strong antiwar sentiment existed in the United States, especially in New England. Federalists called it an offensive war, sure to ruin America. Joseph Story expressed con­ cern that “leading Federalists meditate a sev­ erance of the Union.”1 Southern Federalist James McHenry of Maryland argued that only a change of administration could save the country. Another Marylander, former Secre­ tary ofthe Navy Benjamin Stoddert, suggested that Chief Justice John Marshall, a promi­ nent Federalist, should run for President. He wrote, “Marshall is a man in whom the Feder­ alists may confide—perhaps he is the man for crisis.”2 Stoddert was not the only Federalist to support Marshall’s candidacy; many powerful members of Congress hoped he would run for President. Within days after Stoddert’s public procla­ mation, Marshall wrote privately to Robert Smith of Maryland, who had just been dis­ missed as Secretary of State by President James Madison. Smith had engaged in a pub­ lic antiwar effort and had expressed admira­ tion for Marshall’s presidential qualifications. When Smith sent Marshall a copy ofan attack he made on his former allies in the Madison administration, Marshall replied: Although I have for several years forborn to intermingle with those ques­ tions which agitate and excite the feelings of party, it is impossible that I could be inattentive to pass­ ing events, or an unconcerned ob­ server of them. [But a]s they have increased in their importance, the in­ terest, which as an American I must take in them, has also increased; and the declaration of war has appeared to me, as it has to you, to be one of those portentous acts which ought to concentrate on itselfthe efforts of all those who can take an active part in JUSTICES SEEKING THE PRESIDENCY 287 Had Chief Justice Marshall chosen to be the Federalist party’s standard-bearer in the 1812 election, he might have fared better than De Witt Clinton (right), the Peace party candidate backed by the Federalists. James Madison (left) beat Clinton 128 to 89, but Marshall’s biographer believes that if the Chief Justice had entered the race, he might have prevailed over Madison. rescuing their country from the ruin it threatens. All minor considerations should be waived; the lines of subdivision be­ tween parties, if not absolutely ef­ faced, should at least be covered for a time; and the great division between the friends of peace & the advocates of war ought alone to remain. It is an object ofsuch magnitude as to give to almost every other, comparative in­ significance; and all who wish peace ought to unite in the means which may facilitate its attainment, what­ ever may have been their differences of opinion on other points.3 This letter from Marshall to Smith, sent on July 27, 1812, is described by one of the ChiefJustice’s biographers, Albert Beveridge, as one of “the longest and most unreserved he ever wrote.” Beveridge concludes that “the Chief Justice of the United States was at that very moment not only in close sympathy with the peace party, but was actually encourag­ ing that party in its efforts to end the war.”4 A later biographer, Leonard Baker, goes fur­ ther, stating that the letter was a “declara­ tion of his readiness to become a presidential candidate.”5 Most recently, however, Canadian historian Jean Edward Smith has brushed aside any interest that Marshall may have had in the 1812 Federalist presidential nomination.6 Marshall’s conduct and writings seem to in­ dicate a very temporary and transitory temp­ tation, which he soon put aside. If indeed a presidential bug had bitten Marshall, it did not cause any serious infection. Marshall’s competition would have been the politically cunning DeWitt Clinton, a...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,959
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,869

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,289
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Supreme Court HistoryMême sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207