Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dealing with dangerously high CO2 levels is a regular part of life for burrowing creatures. ‘Most animals that are able to tolerate such environments reduce their metabolic rate to re-balance their energy demands’, says Matthew Pamenter from the University of Ottawa, Canada. So, when he heard Frank van Breukelen of the University of Nevada, USA, talk about his burrowing tenrec (Tenrec ecaudatus) colony at a conference in 2019, he realised that the animals might also experience dangerous CO2 concentrations – up to 13.5%, compared with 0.04% in the atmosphere – when hibernating with burrow-mates for 8–9 months. Yet tenrecs are not regular mammals. They can remain active even when their body temperature plummets to 12°C; so how do they cope with the toxic air in their hibernation burrows?Pamenter contacted van Breukelen to suggest a collaboration, and in March 2020, Maiah Devereaux (University of Ottawa) joined Claudia Silva Rubio and van Breukelen at the University of Nevada to find out how tenrecs deal with excessive CO2 and low O2. ‘Our tenrecs are handled very frequently and so they are very docile. To be honest, they are kind of lazy!’ chuckles van Breukelen, who recalls that the animals were content to hang out in a respirometry chamber while Devereaux and Silva Rubio measured the tenrecs’ breath rate and O2 consumption to calculate their metabolic rate. The duo then modified the air mixture the tenrecs were breathing – first reducing the O2 content from 21% to 9% and 4%, before boosting the CO2 levels from 0% to 5% and 10% – at 28°C and 16°C, to find out how the mammals responded. ‘Trying to maintain a stable [gas] flow rate required some troubleshooting’, says van Breukelen.Even when the tenrecs were breathing normal air in the cooler conditions, the active animals’ metabolisms responded unconventionally. Some barely breathed at all – only consuming 2 ml O2 min−1 kg−1 – while others inhaled a colossal amount (23 ml O2 min−1 kg−1) relative to the warmer tenrecs, which only inhaled 12 ml O2 min−1 kg−1 at the most. Raising the CO2 levels in the air didn't affect the range of the cold tenrec's metabolic rates; however, when the team reduced the animals’ O2 supply, the chilly animals no longer had the wide range of metabolic rates they had when breathing normal air.The air temperature also had a major impact on the way the tenrecs breathed when their air was contaminated with CO2. The warmer animals began hyperventilating when the CO2 levels increased, in contrast to the cooler tenrecs, which were more like other burrowing mammals and did not hyperventilate.In short, the tenrecs’ breathing and metabolism were more affected by the environmental temperature than the build-up of toxic CO2 and quantity of O2 available. In addition, the animals in the colder conditions allowed their body temperatures to drift, with some cooling to 20°C while others remained at 32°C regardless of the air quality; all of the tenrecs in 28°C air maintained a warm body temperature (∼32°C) despite the air conditions. The physiological responses of the tenrecs were more like those of cold-blooded reptiles than those of warm-blooded burrowing mammals, probably because they don't have to maintain a high body temperature to survive. van Breukelen exclaims, ‘Many of the things that tenrecs do result in me saying, “How the heck do they do this?”’, and he is excited to find out how the animals cope with poor air quality when breathing as little as once every 45 min while hibernating.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».