Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Every three years scholars from all over the world converge to discuss medieval courtly literature in its various manifestations: the International Courtly Literature Society reconvenes. The meeting in Vancouver in 1998 was truly international in nature. Against the backdrop of the stunning mountain scenery, the warm spirit of collegiality was outdone only by the unexpected summer heat. Almost two hundred speakers presented papers, and the participants included members from four continents and more than a dozen countries. Six different language groups are represented in the plenary talks, and the volume contains papers in four different languages. Since no single volume could contain all the stimulating presentations from six days’ worth of scholarly exchange, this is of necessity a selection of the papers read and submitted for consideration. The book is organized in two major sections, the first containing the five plenary addresses and the second, twenty-nine papers. The plenaries suggest the range of approaches and disciplines involved in the study of courtly literature. We have arranged the shorter papers into groupings by methodology or subject matter. The categories ref lect both current preoccupations and perennial concerns, the best of both traditional and innovative methodologies. The conference was greatly enhanced by the presence of world-class musicians, including the late John Fleagle, Anne Azéma, the group Chanterie, and others. Early Music Vancouver advised us and co-sponsored performances. While none of the superlative musical performances could find their way into a printed book, we were entertained during the banquet by a spiritual descendant of Marie de France who presented a hitherto-unknown lai , the text of which is reproduced here as an “après-propos.” We are grateful to many organizations and individuals without whom the conference would never have taken place. Funding was provided principally by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. We thank in particular: Chantal Phan, the principal organizer, who ran a great meeting; Donald Maddox, who gave us the benefit of his experience in the planning stages; Richard Unger, who provided invaluable help on site; students Shannon McKie and Ineke Hardy, who helped with organization in the year preceding, including setting up the web site; other colleagues at the University of British Columbia, especially Nancy Frelick and Karl Zaenker, who gave advice and much practical assistance; the eleven volunteers who were stalwart during the conference; and Simon Fraser University, which graciously provided funding and arranged for us to use their facilities for a day.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,504 | 0,344 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».