Nature’s Mirror: How Taxidermists Shaped America’s Natural History Museums and Saved Endangered Species by Mary Anne Andrei
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Nature’s Mirror: How Taxidermists Shaped America’s Natural History Museums and Saved Endangered Species by Mary Anne Andrei Joel W. Helmer Nature’s Mirror: How Taxidermists Shaped America’s Natural History Museums and Saved Endangered Species. By Mary Anne Andrei. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020. 245 pp. Notes, bibliography, index. $35.00 cloth. A ubiquitous element of Americana, taxidermy hangs above our bars, fills our home trophy rooms, attracts visitors to our sporting goods stores, and educates us in our natural history museums. In Nature’s Mirror Mary Andrei not only describes in detail the development and evolution of scientific taxidermy but also tells a thorough and compelling story of how the work of early taxidermists shaped America’s perceptions and understanding of nature, ultimately leading to the protection of numerous endangered species. The book begins by laying the historical foundation of scientific taxidermy, driven especially by the [End Page 180] establishment in Rochester, New York, of Ward’s Natural Science Establishment in 1862 by Henry A. Ward. Although founded to supply natural resource materials, which it still does today, its “greatest legacy” is the role it played in training the “most influential taxidermists, museum builders, and early conservationists in American history (11).” Foremost among these was William T. Hornaday, Carl E. Akeley, Frederic A. Lucas, Charles H. Townsend, and Frederic S. Webster. The author focuses mainly on these “men of Ward’s,” naturalist-taxidermists who from the late 19th century and into the first decades of the 20th century led research expeditions, created increasingly lifelike museum displays, undertook wildlife protection lobbying campaigns, and wrote extensively about the need to save threatened species. Of course, to create their displays, they needed specimens. And this is where this book really shines, describing these sensational and lengthy collecting expeditions in vivid detail. Whether describing Akeley’s bringing “Africa to America,” Townsend’s voyages to determine if elephant seals were indeed extinct, or Lucas’s incredible trip to Newfoundland to find and preserve a blue whale, the author does a commendable job linking these events to improvements in scientific taxidermy and to broader global conservation efforts. For those interested in the Great Plains, the author provides an intriguing account of William Hornaday’s “race against the hide hunters,” where he leads expeditions for the National Museum to collect American bison hides and skulls. In hindsight these events are quite startling, as they kill and skin some of the few remaining bison. Nevertheless, it was the capture of a bison calf during Hornaday’s 1886 expedition that assisted in saving the species. The large crowds that later gathered on the lawn of the National Museum in Washington, DC, to see Sandy the copper-hued calf, led to the creation of the Department of Living Animals, later the National Zoo. In 1888 a Nebraska Sandhills rancher donated six bison, which became so popular with the public that it inspired Hornaday to successfully lobby for a Smithsonian-funded captive breeding program. Extensively researched and well written, Nature’s Mirror is a distinctive and much-needed addition to the story of early American conservation. Although narrowly focused on the work of a handful of prominent taxidermists, the author makes a strong case for the importance of their work. As she notes, it is “impossible to visit America’s major metropolitan natural history museums without seeing their work—and the work of those they trained—on prominent display” (199). Joel W. Helmer Department of History, Geography, Intercultural Studies and Modern Languages Concordia University, Nebraska Copyright © 2023 Center for Great Plains Studies
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».