MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4362454614 · doi:10.1002/jdd.13215

Whiteboard animation simulation for dental education

2023· article· en· W4362454614 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Dental Education · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAnimationWhiteboardStorytellingComputer scienceMultimediaInteractive whiteboardComputer animationGraphicsSoftwareComputer graphics (images)NarrativeArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Whiteboard animation is a specific type of animation where line drawing and narration are used to explain concepts. The combination of visual thinking and storytelling makes whiteboard animations a unique and effective educational tool. Storytelling is a multimodal teaching approach that simultaneously engages listeners’ thinking, emotions, and imagination.1 However, this powerful tool is underutilized in higher education, particularly science education.1 Whiteboard animations, powered by storytelling, have successfully explained complex health-related topics to pharmacology students2 and positively impacted the retention, engagement, and enjoyment of university-level students.3 We planned to create whiteboard animations for dental students to explain complex science topics using graphics and storytelling. However, we have encountered two challenges while attempting to make whiteboard animations as an educator: (1) Making a good quality whiteboard animation requires paid software, which can be expensive. (2) Most whiteboard animation software is designed for business advertising and does not provide the graphics gallery needed to explain health science-related topics. The graphics gallery of the software do not have images representing the microanatomy of the tooth, oral cavity, and cellular processes. As a solution, we have used traditional PowerPoint and hand-drawn digital images to mimic whiteboard animation. Procreate, a stylus pen, and an iPad were used for drawings that were exported into PowerPoint. The built-in animations of PowerPoint were used to animate the images and supporting text (Figure 1). Screen-capture software was used to record the animation screen as a video with a voice-over narration. Our whiteboard animation explains the types of epithelial cells in a storytelling manner. First-year dentistry students learn about the epithelium as part of histology. The animation starts with the story of a boy who wants to eat cereal and milk with a fork. The narration then draws a connection between the structure-function relationships of a utensil to the structure-function relations of cells in the epithelium (Figure 2). We have incorporated interactive self-assessment questions allowing viewers to assess their learning. The learning objective of the animation and corresponding assessment questions are shown in Table 1. Learning objective whiteboard animation: Epithelium of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract Identify the types of epithelial cells based on their shape and function. Differentiate between simple and stratified epithelium. Define the type of epithelium found in different parts of the gastrointestinal tract. Describe the correlation between the shape of an epithelial cell and its function in the gastrointestinal tract. Q1. Which epithelium comprises cells whose height is two–three times greater than their width and are arranged in an ordered layer? Simple cuboidal epithelium Simple columnar epithelium *** Simple squamous epithelium Stratified epithelium Q2. Which epithelium comprises several layers, such that cells high up in the epithelium are not in contact with the underlying extracellular matrix? Simple cuboidal epithelium Simple columnar epithelium Simple squamous epithelium Stratified epithelium *** Characterize the epithelium of the oral cavity. Explain how the epithelium of the oral cavity is different from the rest of the gastrointestinal tract. Q3. What type of epithelium is found in our oral cavity? Stratified squamous epithelium *** Simple columnar epithelium Stratified columnar epithelium Simple squamous epithelium Traditionally whiteboard animations use hand motion to draw and write on a whiteboard. However, PowerPoint does not have that option. As an alternative, we used the animated “human hand” to bring and stick the picture on a white screen or color the important regions instead of appearing it to draw. Adding background music and sound effect can make the video engaging and entertaining. According to Cognitive Load Theory, the learning load of working memory can be reduced by alternating how a topic is presented.4 Whiteboard animations offer an alternative learning scaffold, therefore expected to reduce the extrinsic load of understanding complex concepts. Stories with real-world examples will also help students understand and retain the information. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,826
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,620

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,442
Écart entre enseignants0,402 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle