MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4362509908 · doi:10.1353/nai.2023.0013

The Theatre of Regret by David Gaertner

2023· article· en· W4362509908 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melanie Braith

Notice bibliographique

RevueNative American and Indigenous Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésColonialismRegretIndigenousSociologyDeconstruction (building)NarrativeContext (archaeology)Argument (complex analysis)Media studiesPolitical scienceHistoryLawLiteratureArtArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Theatre of Regret by David Gaertner Melanie Braith (bio) The Theatre of Regret by David Gaertner University of British Columbia Press, 2020 david gaertner’s The Theatre of Regret provides an in-depth critique of the concept of reconciliation and corresponding practices in the context of Canada’s residential schools, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), and ongoing settler colonialism. Gaertner, an assistant professor in the Institute of Critical Indigenous Studies at the University of British Columbia, writes as a settler scholar who criticizes settler colonial structures and unmasks their insidious, contemporary mechanisms. One argument at the heart of this monograph is that in Canada, “reconciliation has been recaptured by colonialism” (5). However, demonstrating how colonialism has coopted reconciliation is only half of the work that Gaertner sets out to do. The Theatre of Regret also inspires its readers to think about what alternative conceptualizations of reconciliation could look like. As a settler scholar, Gaertner is careful not to take up too much space in this discussion as he finds it “imperative that we insist on a reconciliation that centres Indigenous perspectives and creates space for Indigenous voices by quieting settler colonial attempts to define the work” (227). Hence, Gaertner’s methodology is related to what Métis scholar Judi Iseke defines as “pedagogical witnessing” (10), and for Gaertner, witnessing is an act that is “generated in the reciprocal act of listening to and sharing stories and the active deconstruction of settler colonial narratives” (10). Part of this methodology is to create space to amplify Indigenous voices. Therefore, The Theatre of Regret listens to Indigenous art and literature to learn how they imagine reconciliation. A significant strength of Gaertner’s work is that he embeds his critique of reconciliation in settler colonial Canada within a thorough discussion of the concept’s international history. Gaertner examines the Nuremberg trials and TRCs that have occurred in Uganda, Chile, Australia, and South Africa. Scholarly work that compares the TRC in Canada to South Africa’s TRC from 1995 to 2002 has been published in the past, and Gaertner, like others before him, points out that Canada (as opposed to South Africa) is a country where a Truth and Reconciliation Commission occurred without political [End Page 101] transition. This fact forms a basis for Gaertner’s analyses, and the book’s title refers to reconciliation practices in which “concrete political transition is never a part of the terms of conversation” (51). In the theatre of regret, “reconciliation is founded on the promise of change and performances that convince the audience that while the government remains structurally and ideologically unchanged, it will now act differently” (51). Gaertner’s analyses demonstrate how and where the theatre of regret is at work in Canada. He is, however, careful not to discard the work of residential school survivors, and he makes sure to acknowledge that the TRC is “a judicially determined survivor initiative” and not “a government instrument” even though many Canadians still believe it to be the latter (225). The book’s four chapters are arranged according to “four of the key stages on the path to reconciliation: acknowledgement, apology, redress, and forgiveness” (16). In each chapter, Gaertner analyzes one key concept and how it has been enacted within the framework of reconciliation in Canada. Then he performs compelling literary analyses that illustrate how Indigenous artists and writers conceive of the concept under discussion. For example, Gaertner analyzes Cherokee and Greek author Thomas King’s parody of the apology industry in Green Grass, Running Water together with Métis playwright Marie Clemens’s Burning Vision and its character Rose’s angry monologue on hollow apologies in Canadian contexts. Gaertner contrasts these texts with former conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s apology to residential school survivors. Other writers that are analyzed at length include Nlaka’pamux playwright Kevin Loring, Anishinaabe author Richard Wagamese, Haisla and Heiltsuk author Eden Robinson, and Métis author Cherie Dimaline. When discussing the concept of forgiveness, Gaertner engages with the work of Japanese internment survivor Joy Kogawa—a discussion that fits well with the book’s analysis of redress that takes the Japanese Canadian Redress Agreement into account when discussing...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,604
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0110,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,365
Écart entre enseignants0,340 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNative American and Indigenous StudiesMême sujetIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsTravaux en français237 207