MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4362511032 · doi:10.1353/nai.2023.0031

Chief Thunderwater: An Unexpected Indian in Unexpected Places by Gerald F. Reid

2023· article· en· W4362511032 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueNative American and Indigenous Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsIndigenousHistoryNarrativeReputationBiographyMedia studiesSociologyEnvironmental ethicsPolitical scienceLawArt historyArtLiteraturePhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Chief Thunderwater: An Unexpected Indian in Unexpected Places by Gerald F. Reid Paul McKenzie-Jones (bio) Chief Thunderwater: An Unexpected Indian in Unexpected Places by Gerald F. Reid University of Oklahoma Press, 2021 reid has produced an exceptionally well-researched biography of a somewhat controversial but also largely ignored Indigenous advocate for tribal self-determination in early twentieth-century United States and Canada. The provocative introduction retells the commonly understood narrative of Chief Thunderwater as an impostor, fraud, and conman—a reputation Reid dissects throughout the book—and his political movement as the vehicle for that fraud. The fact that this retelling is from an academic article published in 1965 in a reputable journal immediately leads the reader to ask: Who was this man? How is Reid going to tell his story? In answer to the first question, according to Reid’s research and the documents/testimony he examined, Oghema Niagara, or Chief Thunder-water as he was more commonly known, was a complicated, larger-than-life, Indigenous activist and a critical component of Haudenosaunee political revitalization in the early 1900s. The answer to the second question is that Reid tells his story compellingly, including exposing the smear campaigns that resulted in Thunderwater being essentially written out of history as a fake for almost a century. The campaigns were largely orchestrated by members of the Society of American Indians (SAI) and later by Duncan Campbell Scott, in his role as Canada’s deputy superintendent general of Indian affairs, highlighting how key a figure Thunderwater was in the sovereignty movement of the early 1900s. Reid traces the beginning of Thunderwater’s activism to Cleveland, Ohio, where he pushed back against U.S. federal assimilationist policies and especially local women’s church organizations championing those policies. His early activism led to the creation of the Council of the Tribes, a movement/organization modeled on the Haudenosaunee political organization of the Six Nations Confederacy, a model that quickly drew Thunderbird’s attention to Haudenosaunee rights to freely cross the U.S./Canadian border and their continuous attempts to protect those rights, several years before the more celebrated border activism of Tuscarora Chief Clinton Rickard and his Indian Defense League of America. [End Page 140] Reid argues that Thunderwater’s involvement in the border rights issues led to his deeper involvement in Haudenosaunee political revitalization on the Canadian side of the international border. His first Council of the Indians meeting in Canada was held at Kahnewake, and the movement subsequently spread across other communities and reserves, ultimately leading to a growth of Council of the Tribes chapters. As the council grew, multiple members of his movement began to get elected to leadership positions across various band councils. The growth and popularity of his movement and its political ideas led Arthur Parker of the SAI to contact Duncan Campbell Scott with accusations of Thunderwater’s racial fraud. Scott was a willing audience to Parker’s accusations and almost immediately used them as the springboard to launch a smear campaign to discredit Thunderwater and weaken his influence across Haudenosaunee politics. Reid shows how the Canadian government’s smear campaign was successful, leading to newspaper coverage “exposing” Thunderwater and a subsequent libel case that went unresolved. While not exclusively the reason for Thunderwater’s waning influence on Haudenosaunee politics—the rise of other leaders and movements, such as Laura Cornelius Kellogg’s great influence after she left the SAI, and F. O. Loft’s creation of the League of Indians of Canada were also factors—it was certainly a determining factor, especially in how his reputation remained tarnished long after his death. The news coverage and libel suit exemplify the larger controversies that marked Thunderwater’s life; Reid covers these areas with the same attention to detail as he gives Thunderwater’s activism. Ultimately, this text reintroduces a too-long-silenced figure in the long history of the Indigenous fight for self-determination in the United States and Canada. Long derided as a fraud and consigned to the fringes of history as a result, Thunder-water’s reputation is now at least partially restored—personal controversies notwithstanding—as a result of Reid’s fair, compelling...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,507
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,993

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,351
Écart entre enseignants0,326 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle