The Heart Failure Association Endorses the 25in25 Initiative
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The British Society for Heart Failure (BSH) organized last March the 25in25 Summit, an event attended by global leaders who endorsed the 25in25 declaration. The wonderful aim of the 25in25 declaration is to decrease mortality rates associated with heart failure by 25% in the next 25 years.1 The 25in25 initiative will establish a comprehensive roadmap for national and international implementation and has received full endorsement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). The HFA has already in place numerous initiatives that aim to improve the quality of life and longevity of individuals affected by heart failure. The HFA strives to accomplish this objective by promoting research, education, and guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of heart failure.2-5 It also seeks to raise awareness of heart failure and provide support to healthcare professionals, patients, and their families.6, 7 No question that prevention and early identification of individuals at risk of developing heart failure is crucial within the framework outlined above. Prevention is by far the most effective way to curtail the increasing burden of heart failure on public health services. Timely detection and intervention would decrease hospital admissions and release valuable resources. The 25in25 and Peptide for Life initiatives share a common goal of improving the early detection and management of heart failure. The Peptide for Life initiative of the HFA aims to increase awareness of heart failure and promote early access to and adoption of natriuretic peptide testing, which is critical for early diagnosis in primary care settings.8 This initiative is aligned with the goal of the 25in25 initiative to reduce mortality rates attributable to heart failure through improved detection and early management of heart failure. There are considerable differences in healthcare organization and available resources for managing heart failure across Europe.9 These disparities result in the uneven delivery of modern diagnostic modalities and guideline-directed therapies. Moreover, in many countries, there is a scarcity of dedicated institutions for heart failure management, which are inadequate to meet the increasing demand for specialized heart failure care. The HFA has recognized the importance of providing standardized multidisciplinary management of heart failure,10 which is also a goal of the 25in25 initiative. The HFA has also launched the iCARE project, as one of its strategic priorities. The primary aim of iCARE is to improve standards of care and adherence to guideline-directed therapies in accordance with ESC/HFA accreditation requirements. Yes, the establishment of the 25in25 initiative is a breath-taking step towards transforming the care and management of heart failure. By bringing together global leaders and experts in the field, this initiative aims to stimulate discussion and action towards more effective and successful heart failure management. With its ambitious goals and comprehensive roadmap for implementation, the 25in25 initiative has the potential to significantly reduce mortality rates attributable to heart failure and improve the quality of life for those affected by this disease. The work was funded by Italian Ministry of Health; Ricerca Corrente 20/1819.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,036 | 0,043 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,011 | 0,011 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,082 | 0,046 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».