Abstract 1400: Novel expression biomarkers via prediction of response to FOLFIRINOX (FFX) treatment for PDAC
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract We introduce a new algorithm employing bulk RNA-seq to identify a robust set of genes associated with response, resulting in one of the first multi-gene expression biomarkers for efficacy of FFX in PDAC. Ocean Genomics TxomeAI® processed 103 pre-treatment, whole-transcriptome RNA-seq samples from the COMPASS study (obtained under agreement with University Hospital Network, Toronto) to quantify expression for every gene (GENCODE v31). Genes with 0 expression in all samples were discarded. Cases were labeled responder (RECIST CR/PR; n=23) and non-responder (SD/PD/NE; n=80) based on their response to modified FFX. 21 cases were held out for final validation. Ocean Genomics DiscoverAI™ learned a predictor for response. For each cross validation fold (100 random 80/20-splits on 82 samples), genes were selected by (1) identifying genes with statistically significant differential expression (DGE) between responders and non-responders (p < 0.01 and |Log2FC| > 0.5); (2) for each DGE gene, calculating the difference in response rate and statistical significance (Z test for proportions) between low and high expression using cutoffs obtained via the maximal chi-squared statistic; and (3) feeding the 30 genes with Z test p < 0.01 and the largest difference in response rate into permutation feature importance based on logistic regression to identify the 5 most important genes. These were used to fit a logistic regression model on the fold training data. Genes selected during the fold with the highest performance on the fold test data were used to train a model on the 82-sample training set. The average CV AUC was 0.68 (improved over 0.61 training on all genes). On the 21 held-out cases, AUC was 0.63 (compared with 0.44 if all genes were used to train a model). The genes selected by the final model were IGHG2 (Immunoglobulin Heavy Constant Gamma 2), IGKV3-20 (Immunoglobulin Kappa Variable 3-20), IGLL5 (Immunoglobulin Lambda Like Polypeptide 5), WASH8P (pseudogene associated with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome), and HBB (Hemoglobin Subunit Beta). Three of these genes are related to immunoglobulin, and there is literature to support that immune-complex-bound proteins are predictive of response to chemotherapy. All genes in the final model were among the top-7 most frequently selected genes across folds (selected between 23 and 48 times out of the 100 folds). hENT1, a previous biomarker of GA effectiveness, also shows separation of the survival curves on this data set, but less so than several of the identified genes. While additional biological validation and additional computational variations of the study design are required to confirm the genes and predictor, this analysis resulted in a robust candidate set of 5 genes from a large PDAC, FFX-treated cohort that individually are statistically significantly associated with response, and that together are more predictive of response to FFX in this data than all-gene models. Citation Format: Hossein Asghari, Ehsan Haghshenas, Roby Thomas, Eric Schultz, Rob Patro, Stan Skrzypczak, Carl Kingsford. Novel expression biomarkers via prediction of response to FOLFIRINOX (FFX) treatment for PDAC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1400.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».