Assessment of Acute Rejection in a Lung Transplant Recipient Using a Sentinel Skin Flap
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dear Editors,Lung transplantation remains one of the only therapeutic options for patients suffering from end-stage lung disease (1).The long-term outcome of lung transplantation is limited because of acute rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) (1).The management of lung transplant recipients hinges on selecting the appropriate dose of immunosuppression which remains challenging and is currently guided by drug levels, clinical parameters, pulmonary function and surveillance transbronchial lung biopsies (TBBX).AR is graded according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grading system (2) which can be inaccurate, non-diagnostic, and carries risks including pulmonary hemorrhage, pneumothorax and death.Less invasive means for diagnosing AR are needed for management of lung transplant recipients.The monitoring of acute skin rejection within vascularized composite allotransplants (VCA) involves a biopsy of the skin and subcutaneous tissue and interpreted using the Banff 2007 working classification (3).AR in VCA requires multiple biopsies and can lead to aesthetic deformities.Hence, "sentinel flaps" have become a useful tool.Sentinel flaps are composed of skin, subcutaneous tissue and the vessels which supply them.They are procured from the same donor and transplanted into a recipient in an easily accessible site.They serve as secondary monitoring sites for rejection.These flaps can easily be biopsied with minimal risks and no pain.We describe the first clinical use of a sentinel flap in a lung transplant recipient.Research ethics board approval was obtained.A local donor was required to minimize flap ischemia time.Donor criteria was restricted to match recipient skin colour.The sentinel flap was procured by a team of plastic surgeons, composed of 4 cm × 8 cm of skin, subcutaneous tissue, radial artery and veins from the forearm of the donor from which the lungs were retrieved.The flap was flushed with heparinized saline solution and preserved under static cold storage at 4 ° C. The lungs were preserved in low potassium dextran solution for transportation.Sentinel flap transplantation was performed in the same setting as lung transplantation by a team of plastic surgeons.The radial artery and veins within the flap were anastomosed in an end-to-end fashion to the recipient vessels in the left forearm under microscope magnification.The time required to perform this procedure was 1.5 h after induction.The preservation time limitation of the sentinel flap kept the total lung preservation time well within the usual clinical time.The first patient to have undergone a sentinel flap procedure with bilateral lung transplantation is currently 3 years post-surgery.At the time of transplantation, the patient was 62 years old with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with several severe exacerbations.The patient was right hand dominant with an intact palmar arch in the left hand and no history of trauma or surgeries to left upper extremity.The patient consented to undergo both procedures.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».