MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4362591542 · doi:10.1101/2023.03.30.534920

Comparative genomics of carbapenemase-producing <i>Morganella spp</i>

2023· preprint· en· W4362591542 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rémy A. Bonnin, Elodie Creton, Amandine Perrin, Delphine Girlich, Cécile Emeraud, Agnès B. Jousset, Mathilde Duque, Katie L. Hopkins, Pierre Bogaerts, Y. Glupczynski, Niels Pfennigwerth, Marek Gniadkowski, Antoni P. A. Hendrickx, Kim van der Zwaluw, Petra Apfalter, Rainer Hartl, Vendula Heringova, Jaroslav Hrabák, Gerald Larrouy‐Maumus, Eduardo P. C. Rocha, Thierry Naas, Laurent Dortet

Notice bibliographique

RevuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMorganella morganiiBiologyMicrobiologyBroth microdilutionAntibiotic resistanceGeneticsAntimicrobialEnterobacteriaceaeAntibioticsGeneMinimum inhibitory concentration

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background Morganella are opportunistic pathogens involved in various infections. In Morganella , intrinsic resistance to multiple antibiotics including colistin combined with the emergence of carbapenemase-producers (CP) strongly limits the antimicrobial armamentarium. Methods From 2013 to 2021, 172 highly drug-resistant (XDR) Morganella isolates from 8 European countries and Canada, two reference strains from the Pasteur Institute collection and two susceptible isolates were characterized by WGS, antimicrobial susceptibility testing and biochemical tests. Complete genomes from Genbank (n=103) were included for genomic analysis. Intrinsic resistance mechanism to polymyxins was deciphered by combining genetic analysis with mass spectrometry on the lipid A. Findings Morganella could be separated into 4 species named M. psychrotolerans, M. sibonii, M. morganii and a new species represented by a unique strain. Morganella morganii included two subspecies: M. morganii subsp. morganii (the most prevalent) and M. morganii subsp. intermedius . Intrinsic resistance to tetracycline and conservation of metabolic pathways correlated this refined taxonomy. CP were mostly identified among five ‘high-risk’ clones of M. morganii subsp. morganii . A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) cut-off of 100 was used to decipher outbreaks involving this species. Cefepime-zidebactam and ceftazidime-avibactam were the most potent antimicrobials towards the 172 XDR Morganella spp. isolates of our collection (including 145 CP) except for metallo-β-lactamase-producers. The intrinsic resistance to polymyxins corresponds to the addition of L-Ara4N on the lipid A. Interpretation This global characterization of the widest collection of XDR Morganella spp. highlighted the need to clarify the taxonomy, deciphered intrinsic resistance mechanisms and paved the way for further genomic comparisons. Funding None RESEARCH IN CONTEXT Evidence before this study On January 28 th 2022, we have searched for the terms “ Morganella ” and “carbapenemase” in all published reports available in PubMed with no language restriction. We identified a total of 43 articles and most of them (41/43) corresponded to a report of a single isolate of carbapenemase-producing Morganella morganii . Only one article aimed to decipher the antimicrobial susceptibility on a collection of Proteus, Providencia and Morganella isolated from global hospitalized patients with intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections. However, this collection only included 7 M. morganii isolates. On March 2021, when we finished the inclusions in our collection, only 104 genomes of Morganella spp. were available in the NCBI database. Since September 2021, very few reports were published on carbapenemase-producing Morganella with the exception of a study from Xiang G et al . reported 40 multi-drug resistant M. morganii isolates recovered from three hospitals in China from 2014 to 2020. Unfortunately, this collection included only two carbapenemase-producing M. morganii isolates (one OXA-48 and one IMP-1). A report of KPC-producing M. morganii in Japan and a longitudinal study of carbapemase-producing Enterobactrales in Taiwan that did not focused on Morganella. We also searched in PubMed for the terms ‘ Morganella sibonii ” or “ Morganella psychrotolerans ” in all published reports with no language restrictions. Our search identified a total of 20 articles. None of them was related to antimicrobial resistance and no study deciphered the Morganella spp. epidemiology on clinical isolates. Added values of this study This global characterization involved the widest collection of Morganella spp. isolates ever reported (barely doubling the number of Morganella spp. genomes in Genbank). In addition, 145 isolates of this worldwide collection made of 172 multidrug resistant Morganella spp. were carbapenemase producers for which therapeutic alternatives are scarce due to intrinsic resistance to last resort molecules, such as polymyxin. First, we found that cefepime-zidebactam and ceftazidime-avibactam were the most potent antimicrobials towards XDR Morganella spp. isolates except for metallo-β-lactamase-producers. Then, we observed that carbapenemase-encoding genes were present in different Morganella species highlighting necessary changes in the taxonomy. Morganella genus could be divided into 4 species named M. psychrotolerans, M. sibonii, M. morganii and a new species represented by a unique strain. Morganella morganii includes two subspecies: M. morganii subsp. morganii (the most prevalent) and M. morganii subsp. intermedius . We demonstrated that this refined taxonomy correlated with the intrinsic resistance to tetracycline, which was found only in M. sibonii , as well as several metabolic pathways ( e . g . trehalose assimilation, type III (T3SS) and type IV secretion system (T6SS), etc.…). In addition, we highlighted five “high-risk” clones of carbapenemase-producing M. morganii subsp. morganii that have already disseminated worldwide. Combining whole genome sequencing (WGS) data with epidemiological investigations, we demonstrated that a cut-off of 100 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) could be used to discriminate clonally-related from sporadic independ

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,013

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,243
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Même sujetAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria→Travaux en français237 207→