MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4362620196 · doi:10.1215/00219118-10290973

Dhol: Drummers, Identities, and Modern Punjab

2023· article· en· W4362620196 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Lindsey

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Asian Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueSouth Asian Studies and Diaspora
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDiasporaIdentity (music)VernacularGender studiesSociologyAnthropologyCasteEthnomusicologyHistorySocial scienceMedia studiesAestheticsLiteratureArtPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Gibb Schreffler's Dhol: Drummers, Identities, and Modern Punjab is a detailed ethnography and historiography about dhol drumming in the Punjab and Punjabi diaspora. It discusses how the dhol, a barrel-shaped drum used in vernacular music, has become an emblem of a modern Punjabi identity, and how those who play the dhol, despite being the stewards of the instrument and its traditions, have remained unacknowledged because of their social status. Schreffler's central argument is that the cultivation of a transnational Punjabi identity has occurred at the expense of marginalized communities such as those who play the dhol (known as dholis). With this in mind, the book gives recognition to the diversity of ethnic communities who have played the drum in the Punjab, and in doing so yields valuable insights into the relationship between music performance and social structure in the region. This book will be of great interest to scholars of South Asian musicology and history. It also connects to discourses in postcolonial/post-Partition studies, subaltern studies, and migration studies.This book continues Schreffler's previous research on dhol playing. It includes ethnomusicological research conducted among professional dhol-playing communities in both Pakistani and Indian Punjab, as well as among diaspora communities in London, California, New York, Ontario, and British Columbia. Schreffler argues that the identities of traditional dhol-playing communities face an existential threat on account of the instrument being incorporated into a generic Punjabi identity. Schreffler's impetus behind this book is to give recognition to these communities and postulate why, despite the popularity of the instrument, dhol players and their traditional system of values are in decline in modern Punjab.Schreffler begins by situating the dhol within the context of post-Partition Punjab and a discussion about Punjabi identity. Concepts of a modern Punjabi identity center around the idea of migration, in particular around the memory of Partition. Partition (1947) divided the Punjab along state and religious lines, resulting in great violence, rapid migration, and a complete reorganization of the region's culture. In the decades following Partition, identity and culture became strategically essential for cultural nationalists who aimed to craft a unified post-Partition Punjabi identity. Cultural nationalism “serves to delineate a nation through selective identification of shared culture” (38). Artists—such as dholis—maintain an important role in cultural nationalist movements as they create cultural institutions. However, value is placed on a unified view of Punjabi culture, which privileges certain markers of Punjabi identity while neglecting others. Dholis have traditionally been linked to the unlanded and service classes and place great value in their ethnicities and identities (Schreffler discusses these ethnic groups in detail in chapters 3 and 4). Punjabi cultural nationalism neglects the perspectives of such subordinate and marginalized social classes and requires that they divert their particular identities in favor of promoting a unified (middle-class) Punjabi identity.Chapter 2 is devoted to discussing the material object dhol, as well as its functions and uses. Dhols send messages and announce forthcoming events, and different rhythmic patterns played on the drum have specific applications and meanings (Schreffler includes helpful notations and audiovisual examples for different examples). Dhols are played at life events such as births, funerals, and weddings and are used in religious worship. They have also been used as motivational tools for armies going into battle, agriculturalists harvesting crops, and for sports such as wrestling. Most notably, dhol is used to accompany numerous dance forms that are found in the Punjab region, bhangra being the most popular.In chapters 3 and 4, Schreffler outlines the various ethnic groups who are currently linked to professional dhol playing. Dholis have traditionally been from Punjab's lowest-status ethnic communities, and Schreffler's rich ethnography details these ethnicities and the contexts in which they perform dhol. Chapter 4 focuses specifically on the Bazigars, a community of dhol players who were centrally involved in the state-sponsored folkloric programming of Indian Punjabi music during the twentieth century. Schreffler provides a biographical sketch of his teacher, a Bazigar named Garib Dass, to show how the community has adapted to the social changes brought about in post-Partition modern Punjab.Chapters 5 and 6 look at what it means to be a dholi in Punjab and its diaspora, respectively. In the Punjab, dhol playing has long been a professional occupation in which musical performance is directly related to concepts of ethnicity and social class. In the diaspora, however, dhol playing has largely been done by enthusiasts who have operated outside of the traditional social and musical contexts of dholis. The book concludes with Schreffler returning to the Punjab to take stock of the newer generations of dhol players and observe how they have continued to adapt their musical traditions to contemporary changes in their livelihoods.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,255
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,505

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,078
Tête enseignante GPT0,284
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Asian StudiesMême sujetSouth Asian Studies and DiasporaTravaux en français237 207