Deleuze, Kierkegaard, and the Ethics of Selfhood , by Andrew M. Jampol-Petzinger
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In Deleuze, Kierkegaard, and the Ethics of Selfhood, Jampol-Petzinger presents his argument in five chapters.The text also includes a robust introduction and a brief conclusion.Deleuze, Kierkegaard, and the Ethics of Selfhood begins with an essential question; "why Deleuze and Kierkegaard?"(1).Though it is true that one does not find Kierkegaard's name among the titles of the many monographs and co-authored works on various philosophers and artists that Deleuze published throughout his lifetime, one gets the sense that the Danish philosopher was never far from Deleuze's mind.This much is apparent when one notices how some of the main claims of Kierkegaard's slim volume on the topic of repetition seem to pre-figure some of the substantive themes of Deleuze's Difference and Repetition.One might observe a further connection between the thought of Deleuze and Kierkegaard when one notices that the Danish philosopher is mentioned in the second volume of Deleuze's and Guattari's Capitalism and Schizophrenia, as well as Cinema 2: the Time-Image.Finally, one might observe that Deleuze discusses Kierkegaard in numerous seminars on a range of topics that were during the first six years of the nineteen-eighties.It is almost as though Kierkegaardian themes were so many musical refrains to which Deleuze kept returning throughout his life.Given this, it is quite striking that a book about Deleuze and Kierkegaard has not been published until now.In his first chapter, Jampol-Petzinger begins with the modest claim that Kierkegaard and Deleuze "inherit a notion of 'dissolved' subjectivity from the post-Kantian philosophy" (7).The sentiment here enjoys some support, in the sense that Kierkegaard's proto-existentialist account of human subjectivity does seem to be related to Fichte's account of a self-positing subjectivity that functions as the ontological basis of scientific knowledge.Jampol-Petzinger's argument finds much firmer footing when he turns to Deleuze's reading of Nietzsche.While it is a matter of some dispute how well Kierkegaard was acquainted with Fichte's thought, there is no doubt about Deleuze's debt to Nietzsche (and Pierre Klossowski's wonderful text on Nietzsche's concept of the eternal return).Some of Jampol-Petzinger's most astute observations are found in his analysis of the Nietzschean claim -from the second essay of On the Genealogy of Morality -that the self is a multiplicity.These metaphysical analyses continue -albeit with a different objectin Jampol-Petzinger's second chapter.Here, the ambit is Kierkegaard's and Deleuze's competing analyses of repetition.Jampol-Petzinger should be commended for analyzing Kierkegaard's Repetition, which is a notoriously opaque
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».