MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4362736476 · doi:10.1111/1467-9809.12955

RobertTobin: Privilege and Prophecy: Social Activism in the <scp>Post‐War</scp> Episcopal Church. New York: Oxford University Press, 2022; pp. xiv + 372.

2023· article· en· W4362736476 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Religious History · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueReligion and Society Interactions
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoWycliffe College
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrivilege (computing)CitationSocial mediaLibrary scienceClassicsSociologyMedia studiesHistoryPolitical scienceLawComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Privilege and Prophecy is a masterly account of what the author calls the defining feature of the domestic agenda of the Episcopal Church in the United States in America (ECUSA) from 1945 to 1979: a “prophetic” mission to challenge unjust and dehumanising social structures. It is “focused on the liberal white men who dominated the Episcopal Church after the Second World War” (p. 8) and their many programmes, committees, church societies, projects, missions, ministries, and publications that shaped and served the denomination's social activism. Dr. Tobin's thesis is that, however worthy their causes and effective their ministries, their activism was too frequently narrowly defined, divisive, and ecclesiologically shallow. As a result, they helped transform ECUSA from a socially prominent church unified by a shared sense of purpose into a socially marginalised church, rent by internal rivalries and struggling with a muddled identity. Dr. Tobin has probably chosen ECUSA in large part because he knows it well; he is an expat American who serves as a priest in the Church of England, from which ECUSA is descended. But it is also a particularly strategic choice for illustrating the principal theme that interests him: what happens when prophecy depends on privilege, that is, when a church that seeks to confront and change social structures depends on its entitled place in those very structures for the authority and financing that its social programmes require? ECUSA is a perfect case study because, among American churches, it has probably been the most entitled. According to Pew Research, members of ECUSA have the highest average household income of any Christian denomination. It has given the country more US presidents than any other denomination, and, in modern times, more Army generals as well. It has been overwhelmingly white, and its few African-American members have usually been reasonably well off. Many of its most influential leaders in the period of this study were networked into the higher echelons of government, media, industry, and finance, partly through friends whom they had come to know in their expensive private schools and selective liberal arts colleges. Dr. Tobin quotes the sociologist Peter Berger: even though Puerto Ricans, Jews, and Episcopalians each make up 2 per cent of the population, “guess which group doesn't think of itself as a minority?” (p. 248). But although ECUSA during this period was unique among white mainstream Protestant denominations in its social pedigree, it was probably representative of them in its institutional trajectory. In the 1950s, not just in ECUSA but in its peer denominations as well, worship services and Sunday schools were full; new churches were being started in the expanding white suburbs, while churches in the decaying inner cities were being closed; the profession of clergy enjoyed considerable prestige; authority structures were clear and hierarchical; social ministries addressed individual needs with no radical challenges to the status quo; and issues of racial justice were just beginning to emerge, ruffling feathers. As the 1960s progressed, church attendance and finance were beginning to falter; denominations were divided, often bitterly, by disagreements over civil rights, the war in Vietnam, the role of women, and homosexuality; denominational headquarters were growing, but were not entirely trusted; church doctrine was being widely questioned; authority structures both in the church and in society at large were being challenged; ecumenism was on the agenda. By the end of the 1970s, churches had withdrawn to the margins of a post-Christian society; denominational identities felt blurred; leaders could not count on respect simply by virtue of their office, but had to earn it personally; identity politics had arrived; and ecumenism was off the agenda. All this is to say that readers with little background in ECUSA may find this book more engaging than they expect and will likely appreciate its granular close-up of a particular denomination in the broad landscape of white American mainstream Protestantism. Dr. Tobin excels in identifying key figures, summarising their backgrounds, following their careers, and reporting their contributions, innovations, rivalries, and pronouncements. He is remarkably even-handed in discussing the controversies of the day: between the northern whites impatient for integration and the southern white gradualists who resented their interventions; between the racial integrationists among African-Americans and the racial separatists; between the advocates of a centralised church and the defenders of local independence; between those who forged ahead with the ordinations of women and gays before policies were approved and those who wanted to wait for governance processes to run their course; between those who saw parish churches as the chief instruments of mission and those who had given up on them; between those who reflected theologically and those who preferred secular social analysis and political thought; between those who wanted to focus on one great rousing cause at a time and those who, like the Sioux Anglican Vine Deloria Jr., wanted to extend the church's justice work beyond those in the news. The author's examples show how difficult it was in this context to be ethically pure. The conservatives wanted the church to minister love, pastoral care, and perhaps some piety, and did not see why justice should be part of that. The radicals targeted one single-minded purpose at a time, and accepted that, in their rush to their goal, those unfortunate enough to stand in their way would be trampled. The church's social liberals usually felt closest to secular social liberals, with the result that they set aside theology, and seldom had deep pastoral and personal relationships with those whose oppression and dehumanisation concerned them. Nevertheless, there are exceptions. Dr. Tobin does not identify them as models or heroes, but the reader senses that he admires their integrity. C. Kilmer Myers, who ended his career as bishop of California, had a passion for a progressive inner-city ministry that was grounded in his Christian sacramental vision and characterised by radical hospitality and personal engagement. His Anglo-Catholic convictions sometimes led him in different directions from less theological, more ideological liberals. He also had the humility sometimes to change his mind. William Stringfellow, a lay theologian, exposed the double-thinking of liberals who wanted the church to help the world without changing itself. Their assumption, he thought, was that without money, position, and access the church would be unable to help the world; in fact, he said, almost the opposite was the case (p. 82). The breadth of Dr. Tobin's research is stunning, as evidenced by many hundreds of endnotes citing diverse sources. But the text does not at all read like a patchwork of sources; it is lucid and engaging. And his thoughtful evaluations earn the reader's trust.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,094
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,563

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,256
Écart entre enseignants0,230 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle