Reacquainting Ourselves with the Familiar
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Nearly five decades ago, Randall Collins (1975) wrote (and I paraphrase) that a sociology that does not recognize that people really only know their car, their driveway, the drive to work, and the people they work with, is not much of a sociology.Collins' insight-that the action was in the mundane everyday situations we found ourselves, where one gave orders generally or took them, was not new.It was in line with Goffman's approach, which was in line with the Chicago ethnographic approach that stretches back to Znaniecki, Thomas, Park, and so forth.It is in this tradition that Gary Alan Fine and Tim Hallett's work fits.The former, for several decades, has been the principal animating force behind a sociology of the mundane-or the local, as he prefers to call it-while the latter has expanded and extended these insights into a tantalizing examination of how group life inhabits and is inhabited by formal organizations.Many readers likely know this because of each authors' prolific bodies of scholarship.But, we also know that local sociology reveals something primordial to human sociality; that it rests somewhere near the center of the field, if not constituting the center; and yet, its familiarity sometimes gets hidden amidst whatever fads and fashions rule the day.And thus, their coauthored book, titled Group Life: An Invitation to Local Sociology, is simultaneously a full-throated call to adopt Fine's life-long methodological approach that has been built up and beyond by Hallett and a concise and well-written road map for setting out on this journey.To be sure, many of the street signs and rest stops on this road map may feel, intuitively, familiar, but for a local sociology the familiar is intentional, nay natural.Indeed, it is the underlying cornerstone of studying small groups in their inhabited environments.Fine and Hallett open their book with a poignant and pithy quote from James Joyce that captures why the familiar is so central."For myself," Joyce remarked, "I always write about Dublin, because if I can get to the heart of Dublin, I can get to the heart of all cities of the world" (as quoted on p. 1).The invitation to the local is an invitation to find and identify the universal in the most particular places.This may seem so obvious, but sociology spends an inordinate amount of time looking for
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle