MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4365145891 · doi:10.3389/fphys.2023.1191318

Editorial: Insects and changing environments: Emerging perspectives on abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms

2023· editorial· en· W4365145891 sur OpenAlexaff
Leena Thorat, Jean‐Paul Paluzzi, Hans‐Joachim Pflüger, Bimalendu B. Nath

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Physiology · 2023
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Établissements canadiensYork University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAbiotic componentAbiotic stressBiologyEcologyComputational biologyGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Given the enormous and diverse levels of stressors circulating in our environments, living systems, at any given stage of their life cycle are exposed to singular stress factors or a combination of stressors acting on them simultaneously. In this context, stress-homeostatic processes have been central to the field of Stress Response Biology. Among small animals, and as occupants of varied ecological niches, insects exhibit a diverse range of survival tactics. An array of impressive organismal-and cellular-level strategies, and defence machinery enable insect responses against potential stress-induced damages, thereby ensuring their survival and propagation even under challenging conditions.The field of stress response biology has gained rapid attention in the past few decades, with growing evidence and warnings that our environments are changing. Over the years, insects as representative animal models have served as reliable and tractable model systems to better understand and predict the impacts of changing environments (e.g. Thorat and Nath, 2018). This research topic was therefore designed to highlight contributions that investigate meaningful questions relevant to insect abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms and the creative approaches utilized to address those questions.There were three original research articles and one review published in this issue that cover representative insects from various orders, namely, Coleoptera, Diptera, Hemiptera, Hymenoptera and Orthoptera. These contributions provide an engaging overview of the adaptation profiles of various insect species and their survival responses to habitat-specific stress conditions. This research topic collates recent trends in insect stress biology at the organismal-, behavioural-, cellular, physiologicaland molecular-levels using multidisciplinary approaches and cutting-edge tools and techniques.Khurshid et al. report noteworthy findings on the critical role of antioxidant enzymes and Heat-Shock Protein (HSP) genes in the management of redox homeostasis under heatinflicted oxidative damage in the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae. Cause-effect relations of thermal sensitivity in insects has been an important research area, and this study unravels the implied potential of insect stress biology research in the management of this highly adaptable and polyphagous insect pest that burdens the agricultural industry.Fudlosid et al. present new insights on the effects of microplastic-based diets administered in the tropical house cricket, Gryllodes sigillatus. This study examined whether supplementing a standard diet with either polyethylene microplastic beads (75-105 μm) or polyethylene terephthalate microfibers (<5 mm) would affect selected life history characteristics. Interestingly, while microplastic beads did not have a significant impact on growth and development of G. sigillatus, polyethylene fibers were detrimental to the cricket. In summary, the plausible physiological mechanisms for sex-specific impacts of microplastics are yet unclear. However, future investigations examining if and how microplastics are transformed in the insect gut will reinforce our foundational knowledge to devise approaches for tackling the global concerns of plastic pollution.Menail et al. outline an excellent comparative account of thermal sensitivity and mitochondrial metabolic flexibility in three flying insect species, Apis mellifera, Drosophila melanogaster and Leptinotarsa decemlineata. By measuring oxygen consumption in permeabilized flight muscles from these three species, the authors established how thermal stress is tolerated under conditions involving different oxidative substrates. In conclusion, differential mitochondrial plasticity across insect species considerably expands our understanding of the survival dynamics and resilience to thermal stress in some insects over others.Mayekar et al. offer a comprehensive analysis of the use of clinal variation as a promising tool to monitor population-level correlations between active genomic responses to climate change. Drawing from case studies in Drosophila, a cosmopolitan and genetically amenable model, this review highlights interesting broader-scale comparisons of genetic and plastic traits that are not currently well understood. The authors shed light on clinal shift patterns to explain how organisms across latitudes/altitudes are responding to climate change. Taken together, this review proposes the role of clinal variation studies to complement measures of mitigating climate change.Overall, this research topic collection provides original research data and an in-depth review that enlighten us on comparative stress-induced adaptive frameworks in various insect species. Additionally, we anticipate that findings from these studies will pave the way for translational research as well as help leverage the implied potential of this research field in supporting evidence-based policymaking in climate change management and mitigation, as well as biodiversity conservation.As co-editors, we enjoyed working with the authors and we sincerely thank them for submitting their interesting work to this topic collection.With more exciting discoveries awaited for the future, we envisage that this topic collection will serve as a foundation to stimulate further interest in gaining cross-axes insights from evolutionary, cellular, eco-physiological and biochemical perspectives on insects.We hope our readers will enjoy this work, as much as we enjoyed putting it together for you! Jochen's research focused on how sensory feedback mechanisms, neuronal networks, and neuromodulation lead to meaningful behavior in insects and other arthropods. When not in the lab, Jochen was a keen birder, loved nature and enjoyed taking students to field excursions.Apart from his professional credentials, Jochen was wonderful human being who touched the lives of many! As his co-editors, we thank Jochen for his unwavering support, generous scientific and technical advice and for co-editing the submissions published in this research topic collection.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,079

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,013
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,002
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0050,005
Science ouverte0,0030,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0240,012

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,226
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in PhysiologyMême sujetInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorTravaux en français237 207