MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4365515567 · doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1167529

Editorial: Plant science’s contribution to fighting viral pandemics: COVID-19 as a case study, volume II

2023· editorial· en· W4365515567 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
F Ponz, Linda Avesani

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Plant Science · 2023
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiquePlant tissue culture and regeneration
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Pandemic2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)VirologyVolume (thermodynamics)BiologyMedicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)OutbreakPhysicsDiseaseInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This RESEARCH TOPIC is a continuation of the previous Volume I under the same title. We already considered the increasing role of plants and plant biotechnology in different areas of the fight against diseases, including viral pandemics. A significant step in the implementation of the technology for COVID-19 took place in between the two editorials. We mentioned in the first one that a plant-made vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 was in the phase III of its clinical trials. In February 2022 Medicago Inc., the Canadian company performing the development, received the authorization for commercialization by Health Canada, and the vaccine was introduced on the market under the name Covifenz, in collaboration with the big pharma GlaxoSmithKline. It represented the first vaccine, among the likely upcoming several, made in plants against a human pathogenic virus. Unfortunately, due to strategic economic reasons of the only stakeholder of the company, Medicago has ceased operations in February 2023. It is important to highlight that this decision does not seem to be related to the quality of the vaccine or any other technical or scientific reason, but just to the strategy of the company in relation to the market circumstances.FPS decided to open a second volume in order to make room to new relevant contributions that we kept receiving about the issue. Now four new articles have been published in this second volume, a review article and three ones containing new original researches.The review article by Farmanpour-Kalalagh et al., a joint paper between laboratories in Iran and The Netherlands, deals with the potential of artemisinins against COVID-19 and other pathological conditions. These are sesquiterpene derivatives abundant in sweet wormwood (Artemisia annua L.) glandular trichomes, with a traditional use in malaria treatments. Since artemisinins may inhibit binding of the spike protein to cellular receptors, it could prevent the activation of the NF-κΒ signaling pathway and the subsequent damaging 'cytokine storm'. The article also considers possible mechanisms of action of this family of molecules in cancer treatment, and the approaches to increase their production in plants through classical plant breeding and bioengineering.The three original research articles describe different ways for the application of molecular farming to the production of useful molecules in the COVID-19 fight.The Thailand work by Khorattanakulchai et al. leans on their previously reported plant-made receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 fused with the Fc region of human IgG1, in order to test its immunogenicity in a three-dose intramuscular injection protocol in macaques. Their results show that the monkeys developed significantly high levels of antigen-specific antibodies, and that these had neutralizing activity against several virus variants. The fact that the test was performed in higher simians represents a significant step forward towards a new plant-made vaccine for humans.Italian work by Frigerio et al. shows the usefulness of N. benthamiana to produce SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies after transient expression of their corresponding genetic constructs in the plant. Two neutralizing antibodies, obtained from a convalescent patient or a vaccinated person, were expressed in plants that had been glycoengineered in order to knock-out xylosil and fucosil transferases, reaching a reasonably good yield, yet with differences between them. Importantly, both antibodies showed a human-like glycosylation profile, were able to specifically bind to RBD, compete with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 binding in vitro, and showed good neutralization potency, although again with differences. The results presented highlight the potential of the plant system for the quick production of neutralizing antibodies useful in therapy and diagnosis in pandemic emergencies.A different technological approach is taken in the paper by Rebelo et al., working in Portugal. Rather than the more popular transient expression, they show the production of both RBD and Spike proteins in stably transformed suspension cultures of tobacco and the alfalfa-related species Medicago truncatula. Production in plant cell suspension cultures is not as rapid as transient expression, but it has the typical desirable characteristics of processes aimed at stable and constant production. In this work, both proteins can found in the suspension culture medium, with different glycoforms. The legume-based system showed better performance. The presence in the culture medium is an unquestionable added value to facilitate further protein purification.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,009
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,028

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,014
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0050,003
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0090,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,275 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in Plant Science→Même sujetPlant tissue culture and regeneration→Travaux en français237 207→