MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4365800190 · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17068280.v1

New Perspectives on the Chronostratigraphy and Magmatic Evolution of the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand

2015· dissertation· en· W4365800190 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Jenni L. Hopkins

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesVictoria UniversityVictoria University of WellingtonUniversité du Québec à MontréalSouth African Veterinary FoundationNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric ResearchUniversity of Otago
Mots-clésTephraGeologyVolcanoTephrochronologyVolcanic hazardsPhreatomagmatic eruptionBasaltGeochemistryIntraplate earthquakeMaarExplosive eruptionChronologyLavaEarth scienceRhyoliteMagmaSeismologyPaleontologyVolcanic rockTectonics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Understanding the eruptive history of a volcanically active region is critical in assessing the hazard and risk posed by future eruptions. In regions where surface deposits are poorly preserved, and ambiguously sourced, tephrostratigraphy is a powerful tool to assess the characteristics of past eruptions. The city of Auckland, New Zealand’s largest urban centre and home to ca. 1.4 million people, is built on top of the active Auckland Volcanic Field (AVF). The AVF is an intraplate monogenetic basaltic volcanic field, with ca. 53 eruptive centres located in an area of ca. 360 km2. Little is known however, about the evolution of the field because the numerical and relative ages of the eruptions are only loosely constrained, and therefore the precise order of many eruptions is unknown. Here I apply tephrostratigraphic and geochemical techniques to investigate the chronology and magmatic evolution of the AVF eruptions. First, I present an improved methodology for in-situ analysis of lacustrine maar cores from the AVF by employing magnetic susceptibility and X-ray density scanning on intact cores. These techniques are coupled with geochemical microanalysis of the tephra-derived glass shards to reveal details of reworking within the cores. These details not only allow assessment of the deposit relationships within cores (e.g. primary vs. reworked horizons), but also to correlate tephra horizons between cores. Through the correlation of tephra units across cores from a variety of locations across the field, an improved regional tephrostratigraphic framework for the AVF deposits has been established. Following on from this, I detail the methods developed in this study to correlate tephra horizons within the maar cores back to their eruptive source. This technique uses geochemical fingerprinting to link the glass analyses from tephra samples to whole rock compositions. Such an approach has not been previously attempted due to the complications caused by fractional crystallisation, which affects concentrations of certain key elements in whole rock analyses. My method resolves these issues by using incompatible trace elements, which are preferentially retained in melt over crystals, and therefore retain comparable concentrations and concentration ratios between these two types of sample. Because of the primitive nature of the AVF magmas, their trace element signature is largely controlled by the involvement of several distinct mantle sources. This leads to significant variability between the volcanic centres that thus can be used for individually fingerprinting, and correlating tephra to whole rocks. Nevertheless, in some cases geochemistry cannot provide an unambiguous correlation, and a multifaceted approach is required to allow the correlation of the tephra horizons to source. The other criteria used to correlate tephra deposits to their source centre include, Ar-Ar ages of the centres, modelled and calculated ages of the tephra deposits, the scale of eruption, and the deposit locations and thicknesses. The results of this research outline the methodology for assessing occurrence and characteristics of basaltic tephra horizons within lacustrine maar cores, and the methodology for correlating these horizons to their eruptive source. In doing this the relative eruption order of the AVF is accurately determined for the first time. Temporal trends suggest acceleration of eruption repose periods to 21 ka followed by deceleration to present. Although no spatial evolution is observed, coupling of some centres is seen when spatial and temporal evolution are combined. The geochemical signature of the magmas appears to evolve in a cyclic manner with time, incorporating increasing amount of a shallow source. This evolution is seen both during a single eruption sequence and throughout the lifespan of the AVF. Finally, pre-eruptive processes are assessed as part of the study of the magmatic evolution of the AVF. The effects of contamination from the crust and lithosphere through which the magma ascends are evaluated using the Re-Os isotope system. The results show there are variable inputs from crustal sources, which have previously not been identified by traditional isotope systems (e.g. Pb-Sr-Nd isotopes). Two sources of contamination are identified based on their Os systematics relating to two terranes beneath the AVF: the metasedimentary crust and the Dun Mountain Ophiolite Belt. The identification of this process suggests there is interaction of ascending melt with the crust, contrary to what previous studies have concluded. This body of research has provided a detailed reconstruction of the chronostratigraphy and magmatic evolution of the AVF to aid accurate and detailed risk assessment of the threat posed by a future eruption from the Auckland Volcanic Field.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,562
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,882

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0030,004
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,196
Écart entre enseignants0,189 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetGeological and Geochemical Analysis→Travaux en français237 207→