Synthesis of Low Cost Activated Carbon from Agriculture Wase for Wastewater Treatment
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Although biological wastewater is considered the most widely used system to treat wastewater, it is not suitable for many industrial wastes that contain inhibitory substances for the growth of bacteria [1].Therefore, adsorption is considered an vital process in industrial wastewater treatment and can be regarded as the most cost-effective and easy process for removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater [2,3].Activated carbon has been the adsorbent extensively used over the past years.It is highly effective in removing heavy metals; however, the cost-effectiveness of adsorption technology depends on using a low-cost adsorbent [4].The low-cost adsorbents must be abundant and available in nature, effective and efficient in heavy metal removal.Agricultural wastes are gaining increased attention among low-cost adsorbents as they are abundant in nature and require proper disposal [5].In this study, five different agricultural wastes were collected from the local market, named a) peanut husk, b) corn straw, c) banana peel, d) wheat straw, and e) orange peel.The agriculture wastes were washed several times with double distilled water, dried in an oven at 105 ℃ for 24 hours, and then grained and sieved.For Activation, dried and sieved agriculture waste was placed in a 1000 ml glass container.A concentrated phosphoric acid (85% H3PO4) was carefully poured into the containers until full impregnation at 25 ℃ and an impregnation time of 24 hours.Then left in air for partial dryness and dried in an oven for one hour at 120 ℃ until fully dry.As a final step, the activated waste materials were collected in ceramic tubes and subjected to a temperature of 500 ℃ in a furnace for 2 hours in an oxygen-deficient atmosphere.The final activated carbon was heavily washed with distilled water in a 1000 mm glass container and dried using filter papers and suction pumps until the pH of the washing water became neutral.The different types of agricultural waste activated carbon were examined using the following methods of experiments were used for physical and chemical characterization of the different activated carbons: Scanning Electron Microscopy microscopy (SEM), Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller specific surface area (BET SSA), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR).The experiments proved the successful synthesis of activated carbon.Peanut husk showed the most elevated specific surface among the test agriculture waste, with 926, 565, 393, 433, and 792 m 2 /g for peanut husk, corn straw, banana peel, wheat straw, and orange peel, respectively.As a next step for the research, the products will be tested against the adsorption of heavy metals from industrial wastewater.Batch experiments will be done to study the effect of adsorbent dose, pollutant concentration, pH, and contact time on the removal efficiency of different heavy metals.Using agricultural waste as adsorbents for wastewater treatment could be sustainable solutions for industries in developing countries with agricultural activities, where these wastes are abundant.Many of these developing countries are suffering from a lack of appropriate central sanitation services [6], requiring sustainable solutions for environmental problems.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».