Origin of framesite revisited: Possible implications for the formation of CLIPPIR diamonds
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Framesites are polycrystalline diamonds of enigmatic origin, that differ in numerous respects from mono-crystalline diamond varieties. Their textures suggest rapid crystallization, while the low N-aggregation state of some stones and zoning in some garnet inclusions point to a short mantle residence time and formation broadly coeval with the host kimberlite . This differs from the much older (Archean to Proterozoic) ages of peridotitic and most eclogitic diamonds. In contrast to the rarity (~2%) of websteritic inclusions in mono-crystalline diamonds, a high proportion (> 70%) of garnet inclusions in framesites were previously assigned to a websteritic paragenesis . However, websteritic and megacryst garnets show a marked compositional overlap, making a simple chemical distinction between these two parageneses inconclusive. We highlight several lines of evidence linking framesites and the megacryst suite to a common paragenesis. Crystallization of megacrysts, like that of framesites, was broadly coeval with eruption of the host kimberlite, and some megacryst nodules are characterized by quench textures. Megacrysts are grouped into relatively Cr-rich and Cr-poor sub-populations that may occur within a single hand specimen. Likewise, relatively Cr-rich and Cr-poor garnet inclusions are reported in framesites, occasionally even within the same diamond host. Framesites from individual localities are characterized by closely similar, highly diagnostic C-isotopic signatures, with a majority enriched in 12 C (modal δ 13 C o / oo of −18 to −19) relative to peridotitic and eclogitic diamonds. However, each locality invariably has a sub-population with C-isotopic signatures closer to typical mantle values (−5). Like framesites, large exceptional (CLIPPIR) Type II diamonds from the Cullinan and Letseng kimberlites are dominated by relatively 12 C-rich isotopic signatures, but also include a subordinate population closer to typical mantle signatures (−5). Several lines of evidence are inconsistent with a sub-lithospheric provenance model for these valuable stones. The remarkable similarity of their C-isotopic signatures to those of framesite diamonds points to a common paragenesis, thus also linking them to the megacryst suite. The large size (> 10 mm) of many of the CLIPPIR Type II stones is consistent with such a linkage, as is the evidence that crystallization of CLIPPIR Type II diamonds was broadly coeval with emplacement of the host kimberlite. We present a magmatic model of CLIPPIR diamond crystallization at the low temperature extreme of the megacryst suite, which formed in a pegmatitic vein network surrounding a pooled magma body within the lithosphere. Late-stage (evolved) megacryst magmas would be Ca- and carbonate rich, providing a chemical environment favourable for the crystallization of breyite under lithospheric P-T conditions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle