Notice bibliographique
Résumé
_Russell_ journal (home office): E:CPBRRUSSJOURTYPE2501\REVIEWS.251 : 2005-09-14 19:58 Reviews HANGING OUT WITH RUSSELL, BRANDO AND LENNON P S Political Science / Stanford U. Stanford, –, .@. Tariq Ali. Street Fighting Years: an Autobiography of the Sixties. New edition. London and New York: Verso, . Pp. x, . . (pb). ne Sunday morning in the spring of ,” writes Tariq Ali in his memoir “ OStreet Fighting Years: an Autobiography of the Sixties, I was so outraged by The Observer that I sat down and typed out an angry paragraph in the form of a letter to the editor. A friend who was having breakfast with me that day was cajoled into co-signing the missive. It was published the following week with a reply, which was predictable and pathetic. There the matter might have rested, except that a few days later I received a letter in the post from Wales. It was from “The Earl Russell, .. ...”, and the two lines read: “I should like to congratulate you on your just and excellent letter to today’s Observer. The Observer’s reply to it sickens me. Yours sincerely, Bertrand Russell.” Ali adds that he was “thrilled beyond belief. Bertrand Russell had been known to me through some of his books a long time ago. He was a legendary figure [A new letter, since a copy of it cannot be found in the Russell Archives. Other correspondence with Tariq Ali is present there.—Ed.] _Russell_ journal (home office): E:CPBRRUSSJOURTYPE2501\REVIEWS.251 : 2005-09-14 19:58 Reviews somewhere up in the mists and to receive a letter from him completely out of the blue was both a shock and an inspiration” (pp. –). Ali goes on to write of meeting Russell and his then-secretary, Ralph Schoenman . (After Russell broke with Schoenman, it was the Marxist paper Black Dwarf, for which Ali had previously worked, that first published Russell’s final “memorandum” on Schoenman.) He speaks extensively of his work with the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation in its early heady years. There is an entire chapter on Ali’s visit to Cambodia and North Vietnam as part of an investigative team for the International War Crimes Tribunal (Chap. ), and another chapter on his trip to Bolivia to investigate the arrest of Régis Debray, a French Marxist journalist captured after trying to meet with Che Guevara’s guerilla band (Chap. ). And there are shorter discussions of Ali’s other work for the Tribunal, such as a trip to Palestine after the Six Day War (pp. –). The book covers Ali’s entire activist life, not simply his work with Russell. It therefore contains much additional material unrelated to Russell, some dealing with Vietnam, some not. I particularly enjoyed the hilarious story of the time when Marlon Brando’s secretary called to say that Brando was inviting him to dinner. Thinking it was a joke, Ali reply was that “I was far too busy since I had prior engagements to eat with Henry Fonda and Laurence Olivier” (p. ). (Ultimately, Brando himself took the phone, convinced Ali that the offer was not a joke, and got him to come to dinner.) Ali paints a very entertaining portrait of Russell the man. He visited Russell at Plas Penrhyn at least once, in order to ask for Russell’s support for a protest campaign against a Labour .. Russell spoke at great length of his disgust for Harold Wilson’s support for the .. attack on Vietnam, and related with some relish that he had once refused to shake Wilson’s hand. Ali responded as follows : “So,” I began, “Wilson is the worst of the bunch?” He appeared deep in reflection. Then he shook his head. “Wilson is a small and petty man, but he is not the worst. I suppose if one has to make a choice I would say that Ramsay MacDonald was very dreadful. I can still hear his awful voice telling us that socialism would be built ‘brick by brick.’ Dreadful man. Some say that a party gets the leader it deserves. I don’t think the Labour Party deserved either MacDonald or Wilson.” (P. ) The visit lasted for some time, and touched on many other topics...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».