MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4366809587 · doi:10.1353/rss.2012.0004

Lecture on War and Propaganda

2012· article· en· W4366809587 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bertrand Russell

Notice bibliographique

RevueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIntelligence, Security, War Strategy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWifeDictatorSpanish Civil WarBaton rougeArt historyHistoryVietnam WarClassicsPoliticsLawPolitical scienceArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

January 11, 2013 (7:57 pm) C:\WPdata\TYPE3202\russell 32,2 062 red.wpd 1 Russell to P. Russell, 15 April 1939, ra2 710, box 8.19 (as with the other letters cited). 2 See, for example, Which Way to Peace? (London: Michael Joseph, 1936), Ch. 4. 3 “Sees War in 1939, U.S. as Dictator”, Detroit News, 9 April 1939, p. 12. 4 “Munich Rather Than War”, The Nation 148 (4 Feb. 1939): 173–5. russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies n.s. 32 (winter 2012–13): 170–4 The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U. issn 0036-01631; online 1913-8032 LECTURE ON WAR AND PROPAGANDA Bertrand Russell introduction by michael d. stevenson After lecturing at the University of Chicago during the 1938–39 academic year, Bertrand Russell moved to California in March 1939 with his wife, Patricia (“Peter”), and son Conrad and accepted a three-year appointment at ucla. He then immediately embarked on a little-known speaking tour. Russell left California by train during the night of 31 March/1 April, and he lectured in Baton Rouge (la), Nashville (tn), Cleveland and Dayton (oh), Baltimore, New London (ct), Boston, Saratoga Springs (ny), Philadelphia, and New York City before returning to the West Coast beginning 24 or 25 April. Although Russell wrote Peter during the tour that he was “sick of pontiWcating ”,1 his lecture topics reveal his keen interest in international aTairs. Three primary topics dominated Russell’s speeches. First, he addressed the positive and negative role the us might play in global political and military matters. On the one hand, Nazi Germany might be contained and war averted if the us Wrmly asserted it would intervene on the side of Hitler’s opponents in any future war. This form of collective security that Russell frequently espoused by early 1939 marked a shift in his thinking on paciWsm, since he had rejected the utility of collective security between 1936 and 1938.2 On the other hand, America’s decision to remain completely neutral might result in a European conXict that would destroy all participants and allow the us to emerge as the “dictator of the world”,3 although Russell often argued as well that America might play a positive role in rebuilding an international governance system after a war in Europe if it remained neutral. Second, Russell continued to publicly support British appeasement policies. His most detailed defence of Chamberlain’s conduct at Munich had been published in February 1939,4 and he repeated this view to audiences during his tour, most notably in a vigorous debate with Maurice Hindus in Baltimore on 12 April. Chamberlain, Russell proclaimed, was a sincere man “activated by a guid- January 11, 2013 (7:57 pm) C:\WPdata\TYPE3202\russell 32,2 062 red.wpd Lecture on War and Propaganda 171 5 “Chamberlain Is Defended by Lord Russell”, The Sun, Baltimore, 13 Apr. 1939, p. 24. 6 “Dictators Doomed, Russell Declares”, Nashville Tennessean, 6 Apr. 1939, p. 13. ing motivez—zthe desire to preserve the peace of the world”,5 and he repeated his belief that Britain should stay out of any European war against Germany, a paciWst stance about which he expressed private reservations during the tour. The third focus of Russell’s lectures involved the modern use of propaganda. He had been keenly interested in propaganda since the start of World War i, largely focusing on its malignant uses by governments. But as World War ii approached, Russell had developed a much more nuanced view of propaganda in Which Way to Peace? and Power that identiWed its traditional baleful form while promoting the positive application of propaganda in the press and in educational settings to encourage free thought and diversity of opinion. Russell fully expounded his views on modern propaganda at several tour stops. In Nashville on 5 April, for example, he informed an audience at Vanderbilt University that irrational propaganda would be one of the leading factors in the downfall of totalitarian European states. In Germany, the subjugation of scientiWc truth to Nazi ideology had caused the mass exit of scientists. “In 25 years”, Russell maintained, “this will mean that their engines of war will...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,689
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,855

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,331
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesMême sujetIntelligence, Security, War StrategyTravaux en français237 207