Notice bibliographique
Résumé
'Bibliographies, LArchival Inventories, Indexes A BIBLIOGRAPHICAL INDEX FOR THE PRINCIPLES OF MATHEMATICS KENNETH BLACKWELL BLACKWK@MCMASTER.CA T his is the second bibliographical index to be published in Russell, the first being that to A History of western Philosophy. The present index has been supplied to complement the textual studies of The Principles of Mathematics that have appeared here since 1984.1 The edition indexed is that of 1937, which includes a very few corrections to the text and a new Introduction, whose references are also included. There has been only one pagination in the English-language editions. Although Russell, who wrote his own general index, included therein almost all the authors he cited by name, he missed some of the page references. He excluded those works he cited but for which he did not name an author. E.g., he omitted himself as an author whose works he refers to a total of eighteen times; another example is Moore's article "Nativism and Empiricism". Moreover, many of his citations are incomplete (e.g., many of those to Cantor) and some are inaccurate, albeit in minor ways. Sometimes Russell referred to works by such phrases as "Chasles's great work on descriptive Geometry" or "Cremona's projective Geometry" or "the German encyclopaedia of mathematics". These definite descriptions have been converted to names. And Russell did not always refer to Frege's works by the abbreviations he established on page SOO (e.g. at p. SIsn.). I Kenneth Blackwell, "Part I of The Principles ofMathematics", Russel~ n.s. 4 (1984): 171- 88; Michael Byrd, "Part II of The Principles ofMathematics", n.s. 7 (1987): 60-70; Byrd, "Part V of The Principles ofMathematics", n.s. 14 (1994): 47-86; Byrd. "Parts III-IV of ThePrinciplesofM4tht n.s. 16 (1996): 145-69; Byrd, "Part VI of The Principles ofMathematics", n.s. 19 (1999): 39-61. russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U. n,s. 20 (winter 2000-01): 141-50 ISSN 00}6-0I6}I, 142 KENNETH BLACKWELL A Bibliographical Index for The Principles ofMathematics 143 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL INDEX Some references are only lightly implied by their context, but it seemed best to include them (e.g.,· those to Scott and Sterne). For scholarly study it is useful to haye all such references identified and expanded. There are a total of 166 here, of which a goodly number do not appear in the companion volumes of the Collected Papers. Russell alluded to the presence of such a large number of citations to the professional literature when he wrote to Alys Russell on 15 June 1902: "I am working very hard, reading the literature of my subject, now that I have finished writing about it. I can insert learned footnotes in the proofs." As the textual history of the Principles shows, he did so. There is an item of minor interest, noticed in checking the entries, which concerns Russell's knowledge of Frege. The Principles has four references to Frege's "Uber Begriff und Gegenstand", which is a reply to a work by Benno Kerry. Kerry then referred to this work of Frege's in his System einer Theorie der Grenzbegrijfe (Leipzig: Deuticke, 1890), p. 43. Russell owned Kerry's book and marked this page with an undated note signifYing his intention to see the item. Thus Russell was aware that some people had been reading Frege before him. In the entries below "RL" means that the book is in Russell's Library as it was received at McMaster; the notation does not extend to offprints to be found there. The following bibliographical sources have been of unusual assistance: for Schroder, Irving Anellis, "Schroder Material at the Russell Archives", Modern Logic, I (winter 1990/91): 237-47; G. H. Moore, Zermelo's Axiom of Choice: Its Origins, Development, and Influence (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982); 1. Grattan-Guinness, The Search for Mathematical Roots, I870-I940 (Princeton D.P., 2000); and the unpublished, consolidated bibliographical index to The Collected Papers of Bertrand. I wish to thank 1. Grattan-Guinness, Andrew Irvine and Gregory Moore for advice on draft entries. IOOI Nights. See The Book ofthe Thousand Nights and...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».