Notice bibliographique
Résumé
,%views NIGHTMARES OF EMINENT BIOGRAPHERS KEITH GREEN English/Linguistics / Sheffield Hallam U. Sheffield, S. Yorks, SIO 2BP, UK K.M.GREEN@SHU.AC.UK Ray Monk. Bertrand Russel~ [Vol. 2:] 1921-70: the Ghost ofMadness. London: Cape, 2000; New York: Free P., 2001. Pp. xv, 574. 31 illus. £25.00; Cdn$75.00; US$4°.00. This second volume of biography of Russell completes Monk's largely revisionist account ofRussell's life, covering his last fifty years, from 1921 to . 1970. That the research and writing of the project as a whole occupied Monk for over ten years is hardly surprising. Russell's vast written output, longevity, huge number ofcontacts, roller-coaster love-life and considerable philosophical and political activities, to note just some aspects ofhis life, naturally present the biographer with a daunting task. Previous biographers such as Ronald Clarki and Caroline Moorehead/ despite their often engaging styles, tended to bypass the more difficult aspects of Russell's character and to avoid discussion of the technicalities ofhis philosophy. These were not hagiographic in tone, but in general approving of Russell the man. Yet Clark in particular is scathing about some of Russell's (fleetingly held) views on women and race, for instance, and readily draws attention to some of the philosopher's more absurd statements. Monk tackles the more troublesome and contrary side of his subject head on, exposing it in way that makes Clark and Moorehead's complaints rather slight. The real problem for any critic and reader of Monk's work is to assess the accuracy ofhis damming portrait ofRussell, as it has become in this second volume. The second half of Russell's life is bound to seem less enthralling than the first in a numb.er of respects. Instead of life at Cambridge, overwhelming first love, the monumental effort ofthe colossal Principia Mathematica (1910-13), the intellectual wrestling with Wittgenstein, the bold resistance to the Great War, 1 The Life ofBertrand Russell (London: CapelWeidenfeid & Nicolson, 1975; New York: Knopf, 1976). 1 Bertrand Russell: a Life (London: Sinclair Stevenson; New York: Viking, 1992). russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U. n.s. 20 (winter 2000-01): 151-84 155M 0036-01631 152 Reviews the love of Ottoline Morrell, the brief and passionate friendship with D. H. Lawrence and the formulation of the Theory of Descriptions, we have a vast journalistic output, endless lecture tours, failed marriages, bitter divorces, deteriorating relations with both family and friends, and the extraordinary final years under the influence of Ralph Schoenman. Like Clark and Moorehead before him, Monk spends a hundred fewer pages on this second part of Russell's life.. There are reasons for this, of course; most simply that the first part of Russell's life is more interesting, certainly philosophically, but also personally, than the second. In the same way Russell's autobiography is less engaging after the Great War. But in the case of Monk's second volume, another issue arises: the author finds the later Russell a thoroughly repugnant figure, incapable of love, emotionally maimed, colossally vain, and obsessed by fear of madness. In Volume I, The Spirit ofSolitude (1996),3 Monk had already admitted that he found his subject less than endearing, yet his admiration for Russell's achievements, ifnot so much his personality, was evident. The first volume was a significant biography and important addition to Russell studies because it threw new light on Russell's motives and was solidly based on Russell's own words. Monk looks coolly at Russell's life and philosophy while using much of his writing to elucidate key aspects ofa vastly complex figure. The most pleasing aspect of the volume, however, as has been generally recognized and applauded, was the ease in which Monk was able to move from commentary about Russell 's life to analysis of Russell's philosophy-something previous biographers had not been able to do. Volume 2 appears to conform to the same plan, but with one crucial difference: the author's lack of respect for his subject is obvious . However, in the preface Monk also states that he is "conscious that other pictures could be drawn...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».