Notice bibliographique
Résumé
180 Reviews c:\users\arlene\documents\rj\type3602\red\rj 3602 134 red.docx 2017-01-09 4:03 PM THE PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY ’S CENTENARY James Connelly Philosophy / Trent U. Durham Oshawa, on, Canada l1j 5y1 jamesconnelly@trentu.ca Bernard Linsky and Donovan Wishon, eds. Acquaintance, Knowledge, and Logic: New Essays on Russell’s The Problems of Philosophy. Stanford, ca: csli Publications, 2015. Pp. x, 277. us$30. isbn: 978-1-57586-846-2. espite the over 100 years which have passed since its original publication in 1912, Russell’s Problems of Philosophy remains, and will continue to be, a rewarding and productive subject of scholarly study for a variety of interrelated reasons. First, its enduring status as a popular textbook for introductory philosophy courses makes it a broadly available, and widely accessible, point of entry to both philosophical inquiry in general, as well as to Russell’s complex, fascinating and challenging ideas in particular. Second, it marks an important, historical and thematic point of transition within Russell’s philosophy . In particular, it marks a shift in emphasis from (though not a “clean break” between) the more technical, mathematical and logical work which characterized Russell’s early career, and which culminated in Principia Mathematica (1910–13), toward the broader epistemological, metaphysical, and scienti fic inquiries that characterized Russell’s work in the second decade of the twentieth century and beyond. Finally, the text originates from a brief but exceptionally fertile period within the history of analytic philosophy, during which two of the twentieth century ’s most original and influential analytic thinkers, Russell and Wittgenstein , collaborated extensively upon a host of important questions, themes and topics (e.g., propositions, sense, reference, logic, truth, and meaning) which would occupy centre stage within the analytic tradition for many decades afterward. While Russell and Wittgenstein’s names will be linked inextricably together for posterity, they only ever directly and actively collaborated for any extended period of time during the roughly two years intervening between Wittgenstein’s arrival at Cambridge in fall 1911 and his departure for Norway in fall 1913. Russell completed the manuscript of the Problems in late summer 1911, just prior to Wittgenstein’s arrival at Cambridge. The proofs were reviewed and revised by Russell in November, following Wittgenstein’s arrival, and the book was subsequently published in January 1912. While Wittgenstein therefore had little if any direct influence on the composition of the text, the Problems doubtless had a substantial influence on Wittgenstein’s philosophical development, and the views expressed in it formed part of the a= Reviews 181 c:\users\arlene\documents\rj\type3602\red\rj 3602 134 red.docx 2017-01-09 4:03 PM immediate philosophical context of Wittgenstein and Russell’s enormously important and influential philosophical interchanges during this period. This is especially true with regards to the multiple-relation theory of judgment developed and defended by Russell in Chapter xii (“Truth and Falsehood”). Thus, on the basis of the many insights it promises to yield into these formative interchanges alone (but not only on that basis), the Problems is destined to occupy a place within the philosophical canon, for many centuries to come. As the editors of Acquaintance, Knowledge, and Logic assert succinctly: “… The Problems of Philosophy has entered the canon of History of Philosophy that is relevant to current issues” (p. 2). Acquaintance, Knowledge, and Logic: New Essays on Bertrand Russell’s The Problems of Philosophy, offers a critical survey of Russell’s key epistemological , logical and metaphysical views, as espoused in this canonical philosophical text. The book consists of a series of eleven papers, authored by a variety of highly competent Russell scholars, including several of the leading contemporary scholars of early analytic philosophy. Each of the papers originated in a centenary conference held to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the Problems’ publication, at the University of Mississippi, on 29 November–1 December 2012. This may partly explain why the papers seem to coordinate, organically, so as to constitute a deep, informative, and highly integrated discussion of Russell’s views and of their philosophical significance. In the first contribution to the volume, “The Place of The Problems of...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,025 |
| Communication savante | 0,018 | 0,015 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,008 | 0,013 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,017 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».