MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4366810122 · doi:10.1353/rss.2015.0014

Orwell The Rebel and Englishness

2015· article· en· W4366810122 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Patrick Deane

Notice bibliographique

RevueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeorge (robot)EnlightenmentArt historyMonsterSAINTClassicsLiteratureHistoryPhilosophyArtTheology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviews 79 c:\users\ken\documents\type3501\red\rj 3501 062 red.docx 2015-07-24 10:16 ORWELL THE REBEL AND ENGLISHNESS Patrick Deane English and Cultural Studies / McMaster U. Hamilton, on, Canada l8s 4l9 pdeane@mcmaster.ca Robert Colls. George Orwell: English Rebel. Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2013. Pp. xii, 330. isbn: 978-0-19-968080-1. £25.00; us$34.95. eorge Orwell died on 21 January 1950.The following June his unpublished notebooks appeared, collected with several personal appreciations and reminiscences, one of which was by Bertrand Russell. Robert Colls, author of George Orwell:English Rebel, cites this piece by Russell—and in particular Russell ’s view that “Orwell went through Buchenwald imaginatively so that other writers would not have to”1 —to reinforce the sense that no matter what contradictory evidence has accumulated over the years, Orwell remains “Saint” George, a figure many readers still want to have on their side, and whose alli1 P. 221. For Russell, see his “George Orwell” (1950), p. 6. d= 80 Reviews c:\users\ken\documents\type3501\red\rj 3501 062 red.docx 2015-07-24 10:16 ance with the causes of justice, freedom and enlightenment is generally presumed .2 The point is not that “Saint” George is a fiction. Indeed, if Colls’s book tells us anything it is that Orwell’s reputation was well earned precisely because the man was complex and “two-handed” like the rest of us—that he could imbibe unthinkingly the prejudices of his time, act on them, and yet by force of his intellect and his unusual determination to live, not by ideology but simply responding “to the vagaries of an eventful life” (p. 6), arrive at a personal position more ethical and more humane than most. Colls confronts directly the challenge of describing what Orwell believed— “this most quoted and referenced of writers is almost impossible to pin down … [and] held many points of view, some twice over”—with a pragmatic yet convincing hypothesis.The inference to be made is not “that he was fickle, or that he did not believe in anything or that he did not know what he believed”, but rather that he took life (as his life must be taken by us, implicitly) “a step at a time” (p. 3). Being George Orwell was in that sense an unconscious project for Eric Blair, the Orwellian outlook being the sum of Blair’s interactions with his turbulent time and for that reason inconsistent.Thus Colls: “Identities are never ‘built’ or ‘constructed’ so much as lived and breathed, day to day, until they run out of meaning and have to change.” Finding a “trajectory” in Orwell’s life is therefore difficult, because “it is more a series of intense reactions to peoples and places as he came upon them” (p. 9). Elsewhere Colls notes that Orwell tried “to put himself as far away from abstraction and as close to experience as he could.… He challenged the world by burrowing into it” (p. 11). Colls is principally interested in Orwell’s Englishness, not as something that is the key to the man but as “something that he thought with as well as about, and that … stayed with him from first to last” (p. 7). It is the strand in his thinking “which runs through all the others” and which brought him, for example , into alignment with Bertrand Russell in the cause of peace during the thirties, as well as on the necessity for war, beginning at the end of that decade. And although he was of a generation that “took their Englishness for granted” (p. 3), at a certain point in his life “he wanted to identify with his country, understand it, explain it, be convinced by it, and reconnect with it in its current and previous manifestations” (p. 7). And because such hopes as he had for the future relied upon the survival—indeed the perpetuation—of the best of the past, his work as satirist, journalist and political commentator is inseparable from this negotiation with his Englishness. 2 Here see John Rodden in Rodden and Rossi, Cambridge Introduction to George Orwell (2012), p. 110; and in George...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,988
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,426

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,003
Communication savante0,0080,006
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1270,058

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,042
Tête enseignante GPT0,283
Écart entre enseignants0,241 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRussell the Journal of Bertrand Russell StudiesMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207