Address Delivered at the University of Copenhagen on the Occasion of the Award of the Sonning Prize to Bertrand Russell, 19 April 1960
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ADDRESS DELIVERED AT THE UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN ON THE OCCASION OF THE AWARD OF THE SONNING PRIZE TO BERTRAND RUSSELL, 19 APRIL 1960 L H [In Bertrand and Edith Russell went to Copenhagen for his award of the Sonning Prize on April. They made a three-day trip of it. On the first day they enjoyed a drive around Copenhagen with Vice-Chancellor Carl Iversen as their guide. Next day was the ceremony at the University of Copenhagen. They departed on the th. By all accounts the trip was a welcome break from Russell’s usual round of speaking, writing and meeting on nuclear disarmament. The prize helped, too, for it was a monetary one: , kroner, of which Russell donated five percent, or£, through Mrs. Niels Bohr, to the Anne Frank Committee in Denmark’s fund for refugee children in Israel. Soon after the Russells’ return occurred the U- incident , and then the failure of the Paris Summit on May. With the deterioration in international relations their lives became more hectic. Russell kept two speeches in his honour from the event: the speech introducing him at the prize-giving ceremony, and the vice-chancellor’s shorter speech in presenting the award. Russell referred to the latter as “very delightful” and told Iversen that he and Edith “looked forward to reading these at leisure”. They are kept with the Sonningprisen award bound in red leather along with related photographs. Russell was only the second recipient of the Sonning Prize. He followed Albert Schweitzer, with Niels Bohr succeeding Russell in . The prize is awarded to a Dane or foreigner who has “accomplished meritorious work for the advancement of European civilization”. Russell was asked to give a talk and attend a dinner hosted by the Danish Minister of Education. Russell readily agreed to both (but was anxious not to wear either tails or a dinner jacket at the dinner). He also turned down several other invitations to speak, including to students, but he did request that students be able to attend the ceremony. He was asked to reflect on the present state of European civilization for his talk. He titled it “Old and Young Cultures” (printed in Fact and Fiction), and it was to be his last paper before an academic audience. “Old and Young Cultures” ranges over the major civilizations both in time and place, building seamlessly to a dire warning that nuclear warfare could snuff out all cultures because of the European development of science. russell: the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies n.s. (winter –): – The Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster U. - Russell’s introducer, Louis Hjelmslev (–), Professor of Comparative Linguistics at Copenhagen and a prominent Danish Humanist, was to give “a short lecture giving a brief outline of your work as a writer, emphasizing in particular the importance of your writings to the European civilization” (Iversen to Russell, March ). A member of the Sonning Prize Committee, Hjelmslev was the author of many works, including Prolegomena to a Theory of Language (translated into English, ). He rarely refers in them to Russell’s writings, although on one occasion he cited An Outline of Philosophy on there being no means of deciding whether speech or writing is older. The lecture is printed here, with the permission of Dr. Hjelmslev’s niece, Susanne Agersnap, as a fine commemoration of Russell’s achievements before the last great period of his life.—K.B.] ord Russell, Lady Russell, Mr. Vice Chancellor, Ladies and Gentlemen, L The Sonning Prize committee of the Senate of this University has assigned the task to me of opening this ceremony and of giving expression to our feelings. First and foremost these are feelings of gratitude. Our thanks are due to Lord Russell, not only for having expressed his willingness to accept the Sonning Prize, but, even more, for having consented to come in person and address this audience. For this kindness we tender our heartfelt thanks. Lord Russell’s personal presence gives an added value to this meeting. It is true that it can safely be assumed that Bertrand Russell is well known to all those present. Bertrand Russell is known to be a brilliant and stimulating writer and an extremely...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».