MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4366834255 · doi:10.1097/01.nep.0000000000001130

Novice to Expert: Pathways to Nurse Educator Certification

2023· article· en· W4366834255 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Larry E. Simmons

Notice bibliographique

RevueNursing Education Perspectives · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueNursing Roles and Practices
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCertificationCurriculumNursingMedical educationNurse educationCore competencyMedicinePsychologyPedagogyPolitical scienceManagement

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Since their original release in 2005, the NLN Core Competencies for Nurse Educators and Related Task Statements have provided a framework for curriculum development and revision in graduate nurse educator academic programs, faculty role descriptions, faculty evaluations, and research about nurse educator roles, among other uses (Halstead, 2019). The core competencies and task statements also provided a guide for the development of nurse education certification and the creation of the NLN Certified Nurse Educator (CNE®) program in 2005. The initial focus of the core competencies was on the role of the academic nurse educator. As our certification program expanded, there was an intentional focus on being inclusive of academic nurse educators at all levels of nursing education, including faculty from diploma, associate degree, and practical nursing programs. After reflection and many development activities, the Certified Academic Clinical Nurse Educator (CNEcl) and Certified Novice Nurse Educator (CNEn) certifications were added to our certification opportunities, creating a framework in line with Benner’s novice to expert model of nursing. CERTIFIED NURSE EDUCATOR The competencies were developed for nurse educators practicing in the full scope of the academic role. Since the inception of the CNE®n program, more than 14,000 nurse educators have achieved certification. Many changes in the program were also implemented, including changes in eligibility criteria and, importantly, the opening of the program to the international cadre of nurse educators, resulting in global nurse educator certification. The Board of Commissioners for the Certification Program now includes a Canadian commissioner and a commissioner from Saudi Arabia. CERTIFIED ACADEMIC CLINICAL NURSE EDUCATOR We launched CNE®cl certification in 2018. This certification is focused on academic clinical nurse educators who guide and teach nursing students in clinical experiences. These educators do not necessarily practice in the full scope of the role and do not have classroom or other faculty responsibilities (e.g., curriculum revision and committee work). At the present time, we have more than 500 clinical instructors certified. This year, we finished a new practice analysis and a new test plan for this certification. CERTIFIED NOVICE NURSE EDUCATOR In September 2022, the NLN made available a new certification aimed at novice nurse educators (CNE®n), defined as less than three years of nurse educator practice and with competencies leveled to the performance expected of faculty new to nursing education. This certification is a bit different from the others in that it is not renewable, but it opens the door for educators to become confident in the role. We currently have 220 certified novice educators who may wish to continue with CNEcl or CNE certification. AVAILABLE RESOURCES All of these certifications result from the work of task groups that developed the competencies and task statement based on the literature, validated the concepts with member feedback, and performed practice analyses that further validated the concepts, ensuring they are evidence based. The NLN offers useful publications containing in-depth information, including The Scope of Practice for Academic Nurse Educators (Christensen & Simmons, 2020) and Clinical Nurse Educator Competencies: Creating an Evidence-Based Practice for Academic Clinical Nurse Educators (Shellenbarger, 2019). A new edition of The Scope of Practice, to be published in 2023, will provide information on the development of novice educator certification and specific competencies and task statements. The work of practice analysis committees for each certification program will lead to a new practice analysis every five years, the certification program standard. Each certification has its own handbook, with specific detailed information available at NLN.org as follows: CNE, https://www.nln.org/certification/Certification-for-Nurse-Educators/cne; CNEcl, https://www.nln.org/certification/Certification-for-Nurse-Educators/cne-cl; and CNEn, https://www.nln.org/certification/Certification-for-Nurse-Educators/cne-n.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,020
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,055
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,022
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,104

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0200,055
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,002
Communication savante0,0070,008
Science ouverte0,0020,017
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0220,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,094
Tête enseignante GPT0,499
Écart entre enseignants0,405 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNursing Education PerspectivesMême sujetNursing Roles and PracticesTravaux en français237 207