Aeromedical retrievals as a measure of potentially preventable hospitalisations and cost comparison with provision of GP-led primary health care in a remote Aboriginal community
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: Kowanyama is a very remote Aboriginal community on the Cape York Peninsula of Far North Queensland, Australia. It is among the five most disadvantaged communities in Australia, with a very high burden of disease. It has access to 2.5 days each week of fly-in, fly-out, GP-led primary health care for a population of 1200. All patients requiring higher level care undergo aeromedical retrieval to a bigger centre. A retrospective clinical audit of charts was undertaken assessing aeromedical retrievals from Kowanyama for the year 2019 to assess whether GP access might correlate with retrievals or hospital admissions for potentially preventable conditions and whether it could be cost-effective and improve outcomes to provide the benchmarked staffing of GPs. METHODS: Using a tool made by the authors for this audit, the management and reason for evacuation were assessed against Queensland Health's Primary Clinical Care Manual guidelines, whether the presence of a rural generalist GP would have prevented the need for retrieval, and assessed against accepted Australian (and Canadian) criteria for potentially preventable hospital admissions. Each retrieval was then assessed as 'preventable' or 'not preventable'. The cost of providing benchmark levels of GPs in community was compared with the cost of potentially preventable retrievals. RESULTS: In 2019, there were 89 retrievals of 73 patients. Thirty-nine percent (35) of all retrievals occurred when a doctor was on site. Of preventable retrievals, 33% (18) occurred with a doctor on site and 67% (36) occurred with no doctor on site. All retrievals with a doctor on site resulted in an admission. All immediate discharges (10% (9)) or deaths (1% (1)) were for retrievals without a doctor on site. Sixty-one percent (54) of all retrievals were potentially preventable, with the two most common conditions being pneumonia - non vaccine preventable (18% (9)) and bacterial/unspecified (14% (7)). Thirty-two percent (20) of patients accounted for 52% (46) of retrievals and of these 63% (29) were potentially preventable (compared to 61% overall). For preventable condition retrievals, the mean number of visits to the clinic compared to non-preventable condition retrievals was higher for registered nurse or Aboriginal Health Worker visits (1.24 v 0.93) and lower for doctor visits (0.22 v 0.37). The conservatively calculated costs of retrievals matched the maximum cost of providing benchmark numbers (2.6 full-time equivalents) of rural generalist doctors in a rotating model for the audited community. CONCLUSION: Greater access to GP-led primary health care may lead to fewer retrievals/hospital admissions for potentially preventable conditions. It is likely that some preventable condition retrievals might be avoided if full coverage with benchmarked numbers of rural generalist GPs in a GP-led primary health team was provided in remote communities. This may be cost-effective and improve patient outcomes, and should be further explored.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».