Valences of Interdisciplinarity: Theory, Practice, Pedagogy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Theodor W. Adorno (quoted in Jameson, Valences of the Dialectic 55) This collection of essays on interdisciplinarity arises from a 2008 symposium, "The Scope of Interdisciplinarity," sponsored by Athabasca University and its Ma program in Integrated Studies (Ma-is).Athabasca University is Canada's open university, and Ma-is is an interdisciplinary program that spans the full range of social science and the humanities disciplines. 1 The purpose of the symposium was straightforward: to bring together leading scholars of interdisciplinary work in order to explore the range of ways that interdisciplinarity finds expression in thinking, research, and teaching and to measure its valences.It was intended from the beginning that the papers presented at the symposium would form themselves into the present volume, and I am pleased to present them here and to offer a preliminary reflection on the broad, in many respects amorphous, but certainly pervasive, issues presented by the decisive trend in recent decades toward interdisciplinary research, study, and teaching.The Ma-is program is an expression of these trends, and those Mitcham makes the point more sharply in summarizing the reflections on it of Albert Borgmann: "Borgmann insightfully distinguishes between information about reality (science), information for reality (engineering design), and information as reality (the high-definition representations and creations emerging from it)-and further the increasing prominence, glamour, and malleability of information as reality is having the effect of diminishing human engagement with more fundamental realities" (331). 1996, 58).A striking instance of the manner in which technology is driving new interdisciplinary configurations is the converging technologies initiative, the key document for which is Mihail Roco and William Bainbridge's Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology, and Cognitive Science (2003).As Steve Fuller points out in his report on this movement, "There is an ongoing struggle between the us and eu to define the direction given to the idea of 'converging technologies (ct) for improving I cannot quite end with Israel, however, in his invocation of a "human and cosmic" unity as the goal of a philosophically informed grasp of radical Enlightenment values and interdisciplinary interdependencies.We are beyond resting easy in such unities, and, with Fredric Jameson, I am more comfortable in engaging the question, "Interdisciplinarity, for what?" as a theoretical rather than a philosophical one.As Jameson importantly reminds us: while also critically examining and extending them-in a way analogous to Haneke's cinematography.In "Transdisciplinarity and Journal Publishing," Gary Genosko explores the impact of "planetary computerization" on the transdisciplinary collaborations characteristic of the self-constituting microinstitutions associated with journal publishing.Given the increasingly distributed collaborative effort that such publishing entails, journals become for Genosko privileged sites of transdisciplinary work, work that, in having to achieve synergetic approaches to problems and opportunities raised by new media technologies, must in his view go one step beyond interdisciplinarity to a extra-disciplinary kind of collaboration.After a discussion of several French journal collaborations, he examines in some detail two salient Canadian journal communities, Arthur and Marie Kroker's Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory and Paul Piccone's Telos.We continue the exploration of specific nodes of interdisciplinary configuration in the form of two critical and historical "case studies," as Morny Joy puts it, of two composite academic disciplines, religious studies and literacy studies.Joy sees religious studies as a "field" rather than a discipline because of its very constitution out of multiple disciplines (she names history, anthropology, philosophy, literary studies, sociology, and psychology as the most prominent).In "Gender, Women's Rights, WoRKs cited Frodeman, Robert.2010a."Introduction."In Frodeman 2010b, xxix-xxxix.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,026 |
| Communication savante | 0,014 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».