Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Gaeilge: a radical revolution by Caoimhín De Barra Jeff W. Justice (bio) Caoimhín De Barra. Gaeilge: a radical revolution. Dublin: Currach Press, 2019. ISBN 9781782189077. 272 pages. $29.99 (paperback). Without doubt, interest in the Irish language grew during the COVID-19 global pandemic, which makes Caoimhín De Barra's work one of interest to the Celtic studies community. The work attempts to take an approach accessible to a readership that stretches well beyond academia. In this regard, it would seem to succeed. De Barra begins with a chapter outlining his trials and triumphs in learning Irish. In addition to mapping his journey toward acquiring it, he also offers sage advice to readers who might pick up this book with at least a modicum of curiosity about learning it themselves. As is the case with many Irish, he studied the subject in school. Also like many Irish, he never really used it outside of the classroom, so he resorted to self-study methods. He describes his use of the long-respected Teach yourself books, which provide a good way to form a firm foundation in many of the tongues that they cover. He offers strong praise for Rosetta Stone, which teaches Irish (and other languages) through natural means that approximate the way we learn our native tongues. He also—very correctly—advises that language learning does not stop when one reaches the end of a given course. His organic advice, approximating language learning and retention to the need to exercise daily, is certainly spot on. One can appreciate this journey and may recognize one's own linguistic journey through his commentary. [End Page 162] From here, De Barra moves into a narrative within the sociopolitical headwinds that Irish continues to face, framing the post-independence linguistic policy situation as one that was full of desire and perhaps some promise, but whose application was half-baked at best. He provides a brief history in which English colonialism relegated Irish to the fringes and discouraged new speakers through the economic advantages that English provided. He points sharp criticism at the education system for its failure to teach Irish 'properly', then moves into the social hatred that he perceives toward Irish, one that was simultaneously vague and pervasive. He asserts that this hatred does not stem—contemporarily, at least—from the State's compulsory education policy in the subject. Rather, it would seem to come from English linguistic ideology, which he asserts has no tolerance for any other language. This attitude is a direct result of linguistic colonialism foisted upon Ireland in previous centuries: This disdain for speakers of other languages appears to remain today, long after the age of Empire has passed. A linguistic study from 2006 sought to investigate parental attitudes toward their children learning a foreign language, with more students believing that parents had a negative view rather than a positive view about second language learning. It seems incredible that any parent could have a negative view about their children learning a second language, but this study shows that such attitudes are not uncommon in the English-speaking world. (138) For sake of comparison, the prose delves into the sociopolitical headwinds faced by other languages, including several major tongues deemed by prominent public officials as 'useless' for no apparent reason other than those uttering the comments do not speak them. Celtic scholars will note with interest that he gives particular attention to Scottish Gaelic and Welsh as exemplars. He takes issue, albeit only in part, with what he terms 'Magic Béarla', or 'English worship', in a chapter that argues that the Irish people overstate the value of English to Irish society and to the Irish economy in a nod to the effects of neo-liberal capitalism on minoritized languages. Next, he takes on six myths related to why Irish should not continue to be revived, such as that Hiberno-English is the real national language or the (alleged) heightened difficulty in learning it. One chapter that will interest those who study language revival includes six case studies of minoritized languages which have been subject to (arguably) successful revival efforts: Welsh, Urdu, Québécois...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».