Mapping the Environmental Risk of Beech Leaf Disease in the Northeastern United States
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The recently emerged beech leaf disease (BLD) is causing the decline and death of American beech in North America. First observed in 2012 in northeast Ohio, U.S.A., BLD had been documented in 10 northeastern states and the Canadian province of Ontario as of July 2022. A foliar nematode has been implicated as the causal agent, along with some bacterial taxa. No effective treatments have been documented in the primary literature. Irrespective of potential treatments, prevention and prompt eradication (rapid responses) remain the most cost-effective approaches to the management of forest tree disease. For these approaches to be feasible, however, it is necessary to understand the factors that contribute to BLD spread and use them in estimation of risk. Here, we conducted an analysis of BLD risk across northern Ohio, western Pennsylvania, western New York, and northern West Virginia, U.S.A. In the absence of symptoms, an area cannot necessarily be deemed free of BLD (i.e., absence of BLD cannot be certain) due to its fast spread and the lag in symptom expression (latency) after infection. Therefore, we employed two widely used presence-only species distribution models (SDMs), one-class support vector machine (OCSVM), and maximum entropy (Maxent) to predict the spatial pattern of BLD risk based on BLD presence records and associated environmental variables. Our results show that both methods work well for BLD environmental risk modeling purposes, but Maxent outperforms OCSVM with respect to both the quantitative receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis and the qualitative evaluation of the spatial risk maps. Meanwhile, the Maxent model provides a quantification of variable contribution for different environmental factors, indicating that meteorological (isothermality and temperature seasonality) and land cover type (closed broadleaved deciduous forest) factors are likely key contributors to BLD distribution. Moreover, the future trajectories of BLD risk over our study area in the context of climate change were investigated by comparing the current and future risk maps obtained by Maxent. In addition to offering the ability to predict where the disease may spread next, our work contributes to the epidemiological characterization of BLD, providing new lines of investigation to improve ecological or silvicultural management. Furthermore, this study shows strong potential for extension of environmental risk mapping over the full American beech distribution range so that proactive management measures can be put in place. Similar approaches can be designed for other significant or emerging forest pest problems, contributing to overall management efficiency and efficacy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».