Nurses’ work, work psychology, and the evolution & devolution of care provision in nursing homes: A scoping review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Societal aging is exerting profound impacts on providers of long-term care. Nurses provide much of the direct care in the long-term care sector, and they increasingly provide unit- and facility-level leadership and fill top administrative and clinical roles.The work health and quality of work life of long-term care nurses are emergent concerns and the foci of research across multiple disciplines. Objectives: To enhance our understanding of factors influencing long-term care nurses' work health and quality of work life, we summarize the findings of disparate studies across diverse disciplines, time, and jurisdictions. Eligibility criteria: No restrictions were placed on study date, design, or country. Searches were restricted to English language only or translated studies. Included studies reported associations and relationships between/amongst nurses' work (role and work design), work environments, work attitudes, and work outcomes. Published peer-reviewed studies and reviews were included, as were reports. Editorials and opinion pieces were excluded. The search included publications up to March 2022. Sources of evidence: Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, EMBASE, Scopus, PSNet. Charting methods: Data abstraction from full-text articles. Results: The evolution of long-term care nurses' work to include both medical and administrative responsibilities has generally not been managed well, resulting in persistent role ambiguity, job dissatisfaction, and burnout. Nurses are concerned about their capacity to provide resident care and the adequacy of their preparation. Their work environments are under-resourced, and they are at high risk for workplace injury or violence. Supervisory and organizational support can be protective of negative aspects of nurses' work environments. Supervisory support can improve the immediate work environment, assist nurses in fulfilling their roles, and afford greater role clarity, and supervisors can influence their nursing staff's perceptions of the work safety and the value that their organization places on them. Organizational support can reduce work stress, enhance feelings of self-worth, and mitigate some of the self-stigmatization that influences long-term care nurses' attitudes toward themselves and their work, which influences work outcomes, including job performance and quality of resident care. Conclusions: Work stress, burnout, increased turnover, decreased morale and work motivation, increased health and safety concerns, and decreases in job satisfaction accompanied by self-stigmatization are all indicators of a system that has failed nurses, other long-term care staff, and nursing home residents. We consider the implications of our findings for enhancing the work health and quality of life of nurses working in long-term care and identify gaps in knowledge about their psychological health that merit future study. Tweetable Abstract: The long-term care sector is failing nurses globally. This review is a step toward understanding how we can improve the work psychology, including work-related psychological health, of nurses in long-term care.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».