MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4377203642 · doi:10.1353/cye.2018.0006

Realizing Article 31 through General Comment No. 17: Overcoming Challenges and the Quest for an Optimum Play Environment

2018· article· en· W4377203642 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
John H. McKendrick, Janet Loebach, Theresa Casey

Notice bibliographique

RevueChildren Youth and Environments · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueChildren's Rights and Participation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConvention on the Rights of the ChildConventionSociologyArticulation (sociology)CitationMental healthAction (physics)LawPsychologyHuman rightsPoliticsPolitical scienceSocial sciencePsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

 2018 Children, Youth and Environments Children, Youth and Environments 28(2), 2018 Realizing Article 31 through General Comment No. 17: Overcoming Challenges and the Quest for an Optimum Play Environment John H. McKendrick Glasgow School for Business and Society, Glasgow Caledonian University Glasgow, Scotland Janet Loebach Centre for Addiction and Mental Health London, Canada Theresa Casey International Play Association: Promoting the Child's Right to Play Edinburgh, Scotland Citation: McKendrick, J. H., Loebach, J., & Casey, T. (2018). Realizing article 31 through General Comment No. 17: Overcoming challenges and the quest for optimum play environment. Children, Youth and Environments, 28(2), 1-11. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublication?journalCode=chilyoutenvi Global and Local Frames of Reference in Children's Play Although we should recognize that play thrives in adulthood (Dobson & McKendrick, 2018) and there are moments and situations when children are deprived of play (Brown & Webb, 2005; Hughes, 2013), it is widely understood that children's lives are infused with play and that play is of central importance in our understanding of childhood (Lester & Russell, 2010). Such everyday understandings have been bolstered in recent years with the articulation of global statements on children's right to play, most notably in article 31 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC; UNICEF, 1989), the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child's General Comment No. 17 on article 31 of the UNCRC (2013), and the International Play Association's declarations on the child's right to play (1977) and the importance of play (2014). Global frames of reference for children's play are also evident through the work of organizations such as the International Play Association: Promoting the Child's Right to Play1 , Child in the City2 and Right to Play International3 , and the impetus to global scholarship afforded by learned publications such as Children, Youth and Environments4 , the International Journal of Play5 and the International Journal of Play Therapy6 . Realizing Article 31 through General Comment No. 17: Overcoming Challenges… 2 Supporting this global endeavor are many organizations and institutions serving world regions (e.g., European Play Work Association7 ; Playright Children's Play Association, Hong Kong8 ), nations (e.g., American Journal of Play9 , Play Africa10 , Play Australia11 ) and localities (e.g., Beyond Association in Lebanon12 ; Play Highland13 in Scotland). Through their work, they might be considered to be pursuing what Roland Robertson (1995) understood as glocalization, the fusion of universalizing and particularizing tendencies in the continual creation of new realities grounded in place. The local adaption of the global principles that have been developed to assert the child's right to play is explored in this collection of papers; specifically, in relation to overcoming challenges to attain what might be considered an optimum play environment. General Comment No. 17 The play sector welcomed the UNCRC and article 31 has been widely cited and used to promote play in children's lives (Davey & Lundy, 2010). However, fresh impetus to strengthen the play imperative in children's lives has since emerged with growing concerns that children's right to play is not being realized by government, there is a lack of access to safe and engaging play environments, and there are what might be understood as threats to the volume and nature of play (such as urbanization, commercialization of play provision, persistence of child labor, growth of crisis situations, and increasing pre-occupation with educational outcomes) (IPA, 2013). In response, the Committee on the Rights of the Child produced General Comment No. 17 (2013) on the Right of the Child to Rest, Leisure, Play, Recreational Activities, Cultural Life and the Arts (art. 31) to (i) enhance understanding of the importance of article 31; (ii) promote respect for the rights articulated under article 31; and (iii) outline the obligations of agents (including governments) under the UNCRC. General Comment No. 17 comprises six substantive sections (following an Introduction and specification of Objectives and preceding comment on Dissemination), which include: articulating the significance of article 31 in children's lives, outlining the legal basis of article 31, situating article 31 in the broader context of the UNCRC, identifying groups requiring particular attention, and outlining State parties' obligations. Our collection of papers for Children...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,013
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,056
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,082
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,200

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0130,056
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,002
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0120,014
Communication savante0,0100,010
Science ouverte0,0080,013
Intégrité de la recherche0,0820,054
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0600,040

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,051
Tête enseignante GPT0,289
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChildren Youth and EnvironmentsMême sujetChildren's Rights and ParticipationTravaux en français237 207