Update on The Children's Physical Environments Rating Scale (CPERS5)
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Children, Youth and Environments Vol. 22 No. 2 (Winter 2012) ISSN: 1546-2250 Update on The Children’s Physical Environments Rating Scale (CPERS5) Gary T. Moore Citation: Moore, Gary T.. (2012). "Update on The Children’s Physical Environments Rating Scale (CPERS5)." Children, Youth and Environments 22 (2). Since the 1970s, it has been well known that early childhood development and the quality of childcare, preschool, kindergarten, and other early childhood education are related to the quality of the physical environment. Research by the authors and others has found that the quality of the physical, designed environment of early childhood centers—such environmental attributes as size, density, privacy, well-defined activity settings, modified open-plan space, a variety of technical design features, and the quality of outdoor play spaces—is also related to children’s cognitive, social, and emotional development. Based on that research, as well as Piagetian-based developmental theory, a systematic review of previous scales, and child care and preschool standards in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, the Children’sPhysical Environments Rating Scale (CPERS) was developed to provide a scientifically reliable and valid assessment instrument. Development and testing of the scale and its subscales involved extensive reliability and validity testing through expert panels and field research in those countries. Two types of reliability were examined: inter-rater and test-retest reliability, and two types of validity: content and construct validity. The reliability and validity research has been disseminated through international conferences and refereed journal papers. A summary paper was published inCYE (2007, 17(4), 24-53). The results of this eight-year 312 program of research confirm the internal consistency, interrater and test-retest reliability, and construct validity of CPERS and confirm its utility for both research and general use in a wide variety of applications. The work was carried out by Gary T. Moore, with major assistance from Louise O’Donnell and Takemi Sugiyama, University of Sydney, Australia. The Children’s Physical Environments Rating Scale (CPERS) has been used for quality assessment, post-occupancy evaluation, basic research on child-environment relations, and comparative cross-country research on the environmental quality of early childhood education facilities. It is now available on-line through the American Clearinghouse on Educational Facilities (ACEF) at http://www.acefacilities.org/Search.aspx?Keyword=CPERS&Pu blisher=&Type=&Role=Early Childhood&Category=Design&Page=0. ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle