MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4377203901 · doi:10.1353/cye.2017.0008

Children, Nature, Cities

2017· article· en· W4377203901 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Illène Pevec

Notice bibliographique

RevueChildren Youth and Environments · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueUrban Green Space and Health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArchitectureSociologyClass (philosophy)Urban planningChinaUrban designMedia studiesGeographyEngineeringEpistemologyCivil engineeringArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Book and Film Reviews 129 Children, Nature, Cities Ann Marie F. Murnaghan, and Laura J. Shillington, Editors (2016) Routledge, New York and London: Routledge, 240 pages $118.10 (hardcover); ISBN 978-1472453174 What are the relationships of today’s children to urban environments and urban nature and how might these relationships inform urban design and planning to better meet young people’s developmental needs? The editors of Children, Nature, Cities, Ann Marie F. Murnaghan and Laura J. Shillington, both at Canadian universities, assembled this series of research studies done in five countries regarding urban youth and their interactions with nature in modern urban environments. Murnaghan and Shillington co-wrote the introduction, the conclusion and a chapter examining sand as an element and place of play. They include 18 other authors’ studies from Japan, China, Spain, the U.K., and the U.S. to inform the answers to—and prompt more questions about—the very complex questions raised by examining children’s relationship to urban environments and the nature within them. Some studies in the book involve youth as co-researchers and designers of their environments, some are theoretical in their inquiries, and all offer insight for researchers and practitioners in diverse fields: geography, urban planning, landscape architecture, architecture, education, and environmental psychology. The book could serve well as a complementary text in a class in any of these disciplines. The editors “seek to shed light on the actually existing urban natures that children live with in order to shift attention towards this important part of their lives, and improve future planning for children and nature alike” (p. 1). The book is divided into three parts: 1. Placing Normal Natures: The Moral Geographies of Young People’s Environments, 2. Negotiating Natures: Youth, Politics, and Environmental Change, and 3. Learning and Growing: Planning for Urban Natures. Eight chapters relate research done with children and adolescents in relation to their specific urban and natural environments. The book includes diverse geographies and cultural environments. From England, there is a study of the challenges that developmentally delayed children face in recreating in public parks. The U.S.-based studies reflect several unique American cultural environments. The study in Georgia utilizes theater and art with girls ages 7 to 15 to analyze a park’s affordances and develop site plans for a three-block public housing neighborhood. A study with teens attending school in downtown Tacoma, Washington reveals how they navigate and negotiate the city center to find spaces where they feel at ease with nature as they perceive it. An analysis of a Los Angeles surfing program designed to get inner-city Hispanic children and youth out onto the ocean at Manhattan Beach reveals the cultural disconnections Latino youth experience crossing the boundaries of rich and poor, Hispanic and white, asphalt and sand, in their city. A study with New York City youth in Harlem on a project oriented towards civic engagement and environmental stewardship demonstrates the empowerment youth can experience when they have the Book and Film Reviews 130 opportunity to express their ideas for improving their own community with redesigned park access. A Japanese study describes a 12-year collaborative design process with an elementary school’s pupils to create not only a nature-based play area for the children, but a biotope to create natural habitat for local plant, animal and insect species. The study from Spain examines playground and park use by parents and children in two Catalan cities and the use of a beach in Barcelona by area adolescents. The researchers analyze the users’ behaviors in these spaces and their attitudes towards access to nature and how it needs to be cared for in their cities. The research presented from China examines the rapid changes in an area that was traditionally rural and now sees much migration to the city for work. How the city migration and past rural traditions influence people’s perceptions and feelings, and the challenges the community faces to maintain the natural habitat and its inhabitants, including the animals, is the study’s focus. Children, Nature, Cities provides a rich resource of diverse approaches to research with youth in relation to nature and urban settings. The...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,823

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,219
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChildren Youth and EnvironmentsMême sujetUrban Green Space and HealthTravaux en français237 207