Human Papillomavirus Transmission and Persistence in Pregnant Women and Neonates
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Importance: The prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection during pregnancy and its risk of transmission to newborns are not well documented. Objective: To ascertain the prevalence of HPV in pregnant women, the risk of HPV detection in the placenta and in children at birth, and the probability that HPV detected at birth may persist in newborns. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Human Papillomavirus Perinatal Transmission and Risk of HPV Persistence Among Children (HERITAGE) study was a prospective cohort study that recruited participants between November 8, 2010, and October 16, 2016. Participant follow-up visits were completed on June 15, 2017. Participants, which included pregnant women of at least 18 years of age and at 14 weeks or earlier of gestation, were recruited from 3 academic hospitals in Montreal, Québec, Canada. Laboratory and statistical analysis were completed on November 15, 2022. Exposures: HPV DNA testing on self-collected vaginal and placental samples. Among children of mothers positive for HPV, conjunctival, oral, pharyngeal, and genital samples were collected for HPV DNA testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: Vaginal HPV DNA testing was done on self-collected vaginal samples obtained among pregnant women recruited during their first trimester of pregnancy and in the third trimester for those who had HPV-positive samples in the first trimester. HPV DNA testing was also done on placental samples (swabs and biopsies) collected after birth in all participants. HPV DNA testing among children included conjunctival, oral, pharyngeal, and genital samples collected in children of HPV-positive mothers at birth, 3 months, and 6 months of age. Results: A total of 1050 pregnant women (mean [SD] age, 31.3 [4.7] years) were included in this study. Prevalence of HPV in pregnant women at recruitment was 40.3% (95% CI, 37.3%-43.3%). Among the 422 HPV-positive women, 280 (66.4%) harbored at least 1 high-risk genotype, and 190 (45.0%) were coinfected with multiple genotypes. HPV was detected in 10.7% of placentas (92 of 860; 95% CI, 8.8%-12.9%) overall, but only 3.9% of biopsies (14 of 361) on the fetal side under the amniotic membrane were positive. Neonatal HPV detection (at birth and/or at 3 months) was 7.2% (95% CI, 5.0%-10.3%) overall, with the most frequent site of infection being the conjunctiva (3.2%; 95% CI, 1.8%-5.6%), followed by the mouth (2.9%; 95% CI, 1.6%-5.2%), the genital area (2.7%; 95% CI, 1.4%-4.9%), and the pharynx (0.8%; 95% CI, 0.2%-2.5%). Importantly, all HPV detected in children at birth cleared before the age of 6 months. Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, vaginal HPV was frequently detected in pregnant women. Perinatal transmission was infrequent, and in this cohort, no infection detected at birth persisted at 6 months. Although HPV was detected in placentas, it remains difficult to differentiate contamination vs true infection.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».