(384) International Clinical Guidelines for Sexual Health Care in Prostate Cancer Survivorship
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction During the past 20 years, researchers have studied various aspects of the impact of prostate cancer therapies on patients, partners and couples. Patients and partners reported distress and negative consequences for their relationships resulting from treatment-related sexual side-effects of prostate cancer therapies. Research on rehabilitation strategies in prostate cancer survivorship has focused largely on biomedical interventions although psychosexual intervention research is also gaining ground. This research has never been summarized in such a way that clinicians can use the findings to provide evidence-based support for prostate cancer patients and their partners in survivorship. Objective An international panel of experts has developed a guideline that informs clinicians, patients and partners about the impact of prostate cancer therapies on the sexuality of patients and partners, and on their sexual relationships. It provides guidance for biopsychosocial rehabilitation strategies that help patients and partners recover sexual intimacy after prostate cancer therapy. Methods The guideline panel included international, multidisciplinary clinical experts and researchers in prostate cancer, a reference librarian and a guideline methodologist. A systematic review of the literature, using the Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsychINFO, LGBT Life, and Embase databases was conducted (1995-2022). The review was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Study selection is reported, based on PRISMA guidelines. Evidence for each statement was assigned a strength (A-C) and a level of recommendation (strong, moderate, conditional) which was based on benefit/risk balance. Data synthesis included meta-analyses of high-quality studies (determined by the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool). Results The guideline is contextualized within cultural, ethnic and racial diversity. The needs of individuals with diverse sexual orientations and gender identities are also recognized. Forty-seven statements were generated, guided by a theoretical model of sexual recovery after prostate cancer therapies and by principles that promote clinician-initiated discussion of realistic expectations of sexual outcomes and mitigation of sexual side-effects through biopsychosocial rehabilitation. The statements focus on counseling about the impact of prostate cancer therapies on patients’ and partners’ sexuality and couples’ relationships as well as on biomedical and psychosocial treatment strategies for sexual dysfunction. The guideline statements address the assessment of sexual function and distress, and barriers to providing sexual health care in prostate cancer survivorship in globally varied health care systems. Conclusions The guideline documents the distressing sexual sequelae of prostate cancer therapies and makes evidence-based recommendations for sexual rehabilitation in prostate cancer survivorship. Areas for future research are also outlined. The guideline was supported and funded by the Movember Foundation. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Author disclosures 1. Capogrosso 2. Northouse 3. Matthew 4. Elliott 5. Mulhall 6. Capellari 7. Incrocci 8. Faraday 9. Loeb 10. Mehta 11. Howell 12. McPhail J 13. McPhail S 14. Brandon 15. Paich 16. Erickson 17. Shifferd 18. Duby 19. Yap 20. Goltz 21. Odiyo 22. Salter 23. Nelson 24. McLeod 25. Trost 26. Wittmann – 10% salary paid by Movember 27. Bober – honorarium from UpToDate 28. Bennett - Endo Pharma - speaker 29. Coloplast - speaker, training grant. 30. Glode – Janssen, Aurora Oncology, Bayer, Exelixis, ProTechSure Scientific, Gonex, Patents, Seattle Genetics 31. Kirby – Lilly, Astra Zeneca, GSK, others 32. Wang – Boston Scientific, Teleflex, Coloplast 33. Pollack – Gilead 34. Burnett - Grant/research support: Endo Pharmaceutical, Boston Scientific, NIH Consultant/advisor: Boston Scientific, Coloplast, Reflexonic, Astellas, Novartis, Futura Medical, Comphya SA, Myriad Genetics Patent Holder: MHN Biotech Boards: UCF, AUA PAC, Mentoring Mae teens in the Hood Editor/editorial board: Urology Practice, Andrology, Canadian Journal of Urology, International Urology and Nephrology, Urology Times Other: UroMissionsWorks Inc (Non-profit) 35. Skolarus – UpToDate 36. Koontz - receives research funding from Janssen Scientific Affairs, Merck Pharmaceuticals, Blue Earth Diagnostics, and has received personal fees (ie advisory board) for Blue Earth Diagnostics.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,019 | 0,078 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,013 | 0,012 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,010 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,036 | 0,024 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».