Andrea Levy, in Memoriam ed. by Henghameh Saroukhani, Sarah Lawson Welsh, and Michael Perfect
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Andrea Levy, in Memoriam ed. by Henghameh Saroukhani, Sarah Lawson Welsh, and Michael Perfect Corrine Collins ANDREA LEVY, IN MEMORIAM, edited by Henghameh Saroukhani, Sarah Lawson Welsh, and Michael Perfect. A special issue of ARIEL: A Review of International English Literature, 53, No. 1–2, 2022. 330 pp. This special issue of ARIEL: A Review of International English Literature commemorates the life and work of Black British writer Andrea Levy and is the inaugural issue of what editors call “Levy studies” (p. 11). Henghameh Saroukhani, Sarah Lawson Welsh, and Michael Perfect dedicate the issue and Levy studies to the “significance of [Levy’s] aesthetic and political legacy” (p. 9). The editors state that their desired focus for subsequent scholarship is to take more seriously Levy’s transnational and outer-national significance, and they selected the Canadian journal ARIEL to highlight the ways Levy’s work is also connected to places outside of the Caribbean that have been shaped by the British empire (p. 11). While Levy’s work has become increasingly prominent and celebrated in Britain, marked by not only the popularity of her novels but also their adaptations for screen and theater, the editors are invested in critiques and analyses that also challenge the ways her work has been taken up. The special issue [End Page 178] is a blueprint for the kinds of scholarship the editors hope will occupy the space of Levy studies, and it includes a range of contributions that examine Levy’s multimodal work. The issue includes scholarly critiques, essays on pedagogy, reflections on Levy’s life, and previously unpublished works, all grounded in the study of Levy as a writer invested in the violent entanglements of empire. In the foreword, Black British presenter and journalist Gary Younge recalls a conversation he had with Levy about the importance of place. Levy frequently wrote about North London and the places and cultures that influence it and Britain; her work is invested in the Caribbean as a firm, central, and important part of British history through legacies of colonization, enslavement, and migration. Despite the geographic terrain that Levy’s work traverses, she herself lived all her life in North London. During their conversation, Younge suggested that writers who stay in place are burdened with insularity, to which Levy challenged, “What is so inherently great about moving around and living in different places?” (p. 1). Younge concludes that Levy’s relationship to place should cause us all to rethink the ways that places are connected across time and space, and the special issue urges readers to take the transnational nature of Levy’s work more seriously than ever before. Levy’s transnational approach threads through the issue, providing the context for her later work on television and many of the scholarly essays included in the collection. Challenging Britain’s narrative of empire is central to Levy studies, and in “July’s People: Adoption and Kinship in Andrea Levy’s Fiction,” John McLeod argues that Levy’s work is continually engaged in the genealogical work of empire, in particular understanding its impact on private and public institutions. The editors advocate a renewed focus on Levy’s resistance to narratives of transformation to assert that her work is polemical, even as it has been used in the British national imaginary to create a sense of national identity and belonging. Fiona Tolan and Vedrana Veličković read some of Levy’s novels as narratives of imperial and post-colonial melancholia and argue that these novels do not present hopes for a racially and culturally integrated Britain but rather a Britain that should remain under scrutiny for its treatment of British Caribbean subjects, a key point that is overlooked in mainstream uptakes of Levy’s work. Deirdre Osborne makes similar observations in “Sites and Sightlines: Staging Andrea Levy’s Small Island,” which examines the cross-genre interplay between the novel Small Island (2004), its adaptation for theater, and Levy’s self-narrated audiobook. These essays examine the ways that Levy is taken up and understood by British audiences and builds on previous scholarship on Levy’s public reception as a Black writer, challenging her reputation as someone who is not...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».