MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4377694030 · doi:10.1353/cye.2012.0030

Roots and Research in Urban School Gardens

2012· article· en· W4377694030 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kelly Keena

Notice bibliographique

RevueChildren Youth and Environments · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueDiverse Educational Innovations Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésContext (archaeology)Value (mathematics)SociologyGeographySocial scienceArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

338 Children, Youth and Environments Vol. 22 No. 1 (Spring 2012) ISSN: 1546-2250 Roots and Research in Urban School Gardens Gaylie, Veronica (2011). New York: Peter Lang; 195 pages. $33.95. ISBN 1433115255. The well-named Roots and Research in Urban School Gardens by Veronica Gaylie entered into the conversation about green schools, school gardens, and social justice with perfect timing, serving as a reminder of the history that has led to the current school garden momentum. Gaylie provides the reader with an understanding for how these committed plots of land serve students and their communities in a variety of rich ways. If you are not yet convinced that school gardens meet children’s intellectual, emotional, and social needs in a way unique from other aspects of schooling, Gaylie makes a compelling argument. In the introduction of the book, Gaylie explores the history of school gardens and shows the value of these small but mighty urban plots to educators, students, and the communities served by these gardening projects. She accomplishes this by exploring small gardens by region, recounting the history of each garden project, student experiences there, and the pedagogical practice each site employed. Gaylie bridges the history of school gardens with their currently understood benefits for students through case studies from California, the Pacific Northwest, and Canada's West Coast. In each region, Gaylie sets the specific cultural context for the gardens she describes. Roots Gaylie’s comprehensive section on the roots of gardens provides a history of school gardens going back more than 100 years. This history explains how school garden plots grew out of instructional intentions for patriotism, economic progress, and an all-around healthy work ethic—themes addressed daily in the political rhetoric of America. Gardens that were instrumental parts of schools 339 provided the United States with child and adult gardeners that helped alleviate short food supplied during wartime. Yet, in our current situation of rapid population growth and rapidly diminishing land for food production, the benefits of school gardening have largely disappeared from our collective consciousness, spurring a movement of school gardens to work tirelessly to restore the concept. As one school garden coordinator stated, the goal of the movement is not to force gardens into every school. Instead, as Gaylie illustrates in each of her case studies, the ideal outcome of the school garden movement is to inspire gardens to become a part of school culture in a way that grows up from the school, fitting its students, surroundings, community and unique goals. While there are aspects that every sustainable and successful garden needs to address, there are no rules, standards, nor molds into which a garden needs to fit. School gardens remain a creative frontier for teachers and children. Research Gaylie identifies the need for school gardens by addressing increasing social concerns like food shortage, a disconnect between children and the earth, critical-thinking skills, ecological awareness, and environmental disarray in urban areas. The schools Gaylie identifies are not suburban or rural areas with sprawling schoolyards; described as “[S]mall plots with high hopes” (13), the sites selected were purposely in dense urban areas in order to confront the misperception that a school garden takes a large space. Gaylie also targets her case studies to schools with strong administrative support for the project, where the garden was still in the process of being developed or was growing, and where the garden was instrumental in the school's identity. Her decision to synthesize schools with these criteria is quite effective in explaining what gardens can become with the right amount of support and vision. 340 For educators with visions of gardens on their school grounds, a valuable lesson that Gaylie tells through the case studies is to start small. There can be a tendency to think of urban gardens as large, complex operations, which they can become. Nonetheless, Gaylie provides a gentle reminder of the amount of work and dedication required to sustain a garden project. Through her case studies, she demonstrates that the planning and passion that emerged from within the school community to generate a plot of land that both engaged students and harvested food crops included strong buy-in...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,126

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,059
Tête enseignante GPT0,265
Écart entre enseignants0,206 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations13
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChildren Youth and EnvironmentsMême sujetDiverse Educational Innovations StudiesTravaux en français237 207