Fairy Tales and Folklore
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Fairy tales and folklore pervaded Victorian society. Fairy tales and folktales were rewritten and revised, translated, edited and collected, and illustrated, and their characters and motifs were found in art, literature, and science alike. The second half of the 19th century saw a dramatic rise in the publication of literary fairy tales, and folklorists collected and classified folktales. These publications appeared in various forms, climaxing with the folklorists Joseph Jacobs’s English Fairy Tales (1890) and Andrew Lang’s fairy books, published from 1889 to 1910, which gathered fairy tales and folktales from all over the world. Authors such as Lewis Carroll, Dinah Mulock Craik, Charles Dickens, Juliana Horatia Ewing, Laurence Housman, May Kendall, Charles Kingsley, George MacDonald, Louisa Molesworth, Mary de Morgan, Christina Rossetti, John Ruskin, William Makepeace Thackeray, Oscar Wilde, J. M. Barrie, Edith Nesbit, and William Butler Yeats wrote literary fairy tales. Fairy tales and folklore also informed Victorian fiction: references to supernatural creatures, such as changelings, fairies, elves, and gnomes, continued to be made in Victorian novels, which used character types, conventions, and plot patterns directly borrowed from classic fairy tales and folklore, as in the novels of Charlotte and Emily Brontë, Charles Dickens, George Eliot, and Thomas Hardy. The 1860s sensation novels, such as Mary Elizabeth Braddon’s Lady Audley’s Secret (1862), and fin-de-siècle gothic fiction, such as Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1897), used references to fairy tales to probe gender relationships and investigate woman’s identity and the nature of female sexuality. This was also the case in fairy ballets, operas, and fairy plays or “extravaganzas,” which showcased more and more technologically complex and sensational magical transformations. At the same time, however, fairy tales and folktales were increasingly designed for juvenile audiences in the course of the 19th century. The publication of Edgar Taylor’s translation of the Grimm brothers’ fairy tales in 1823, published as German Popular Stories and illustrated by George Cruikshank, suggested that fairy tales were accepted in the nursery and paved the way for many Victorian collections of folktales and fairy tales aimed at young readers. Fairy tales were also used throughout the Victorian period to express anxieties or mediate knowledge, as in the case of popular science works. Although ballads, tales, legends, and myths had been collected and examined for over a century, leading to the development of taxonomies and indexes as in cabinets of natural history, late-Victorian anthropologists’ and ethnographers’ approach to fairy tales and folktales illuminated the period’s search for origins—the origins of fairies and those of human nature. The protean nature of fairy tales and folklore generally served to bridge the gap between old and new visions of the world: folktales and fairy tales could praise science and technology and map out new scientific methods; they could deal with the spiritual, belief, and faith; and they could even propose new definitions of humans—and particularly of women.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,014 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».