MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4378228432 · doi:10.25143/prom-rsu_2023-07_dts

Relationship between Cognitive Reserve, Cognitive Functioning and Brain Volumetry in Non-Demented Older Adults. Summary of the Doctoral Thesis

2023· dissertation· en· W4378228432 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kristı̄ne Šneidere

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCognitive reserveVerbal fluency testCognitionPsychologyEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceCognitive skillStructural equation modelingExecutive functionsVerbal memoryDementiaFluencyCognitive declineLatvianDevelopmental psychologyNeuropsychologyMedicineCognitive impairmentPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to investigate the cognitive and neural correlates of cognitive reserve in healthy adults. The study tested four hypothesis: (1) higher levels of education, active employment and active daily lifestyle will be associated with better memory performance and higher scores of verbal fluency in healthy adults, (2) higher cognitive reserve will be associated with better cognitive performance in memory, information processing speed, visuo-spatial abilities, executive functions and language abilities in healthy older adults, (3) higher cognitive reserve will be associated with larger brain volume, especially in brain regions considered more vulnerable to ageing and dementia and (4) changes in cognitive performance over time will be associated with the baseline cognitive reserve score. The first hypothesis was tested in a partially representative sample of 546 practically healthy Latvian speaking adults (Mage = 70.54, SD = 10.19, 37.2 % male). Secondary data on education, current employment and leisure were used as proxies for cognitive reserve, memory was assessed using a ten-word memory task and verbal fluency was assessed using semantic verbal fluency task. To better understand the relationship between variables, structural equation model was prepared and tested. Education, employment status, cognitive leisure activities and moderate physical activities were good predictors of the aforementioned cognitive functions, showing a good model fit (χ2(7) = 30.837, CFI = 0.970, RMSEA = 0.079, SRMR = 0.058). The second hypothesis was tested in a sample of 61 Latvian speaking practically healthy older adults (Mage = 72.19, SD = 5.02). Cognitive reserve was measured using Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (Nucci et al., 2012), working memory, associative memory, processing speed and vocabulary was assessed with Woodcock-Johnson III: Tests of Cognitive Abilities (Paleja, 2006), short- and long-term memory measures were obtained with The Ten-word Memory test (Luria, 1976), reaction time was assessed using the Handball goalie reaction test and data on executive functions and visuo-spatial abilities were obtained using three subtests from Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (Nasreddine et al., 2005). Higher scores of cognitive reserve and its sub-indices – education and occupation – were associated with better short-term memory performance, larger vocabulary (CRI-Education) and higher verbal fluency scores and faster reaction times (CRI-Occupation). The results were partially compliant with the results from the larger sample. The third hypothesis was tested in a sample of 58 Latvian speaking older adults (M = 72.19, SD = 5.02, 23.9 % male). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were obtained with Siemens 1.5 Tesla Avanto MRI scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) and analysed with Freesurfer 7.2. software. Results partially confirmed the hypothesis, showing that higher occupational achievement and higher cognitive reserve in general were associated with larger cortical volume in left hemisphere middle temporal gyrus, bilateral inferior temporal gyrus, left hemisphere inferior parietal gyrus and right hemisphere pars orbitalis; however, there were no statistically significant associations between cognitive reserve and hippocampus and thalamus (p > 0.05). The final hypothesis was that the changes in cognitive performance over time will be associated with the baseline cognitive reserve score. This hypothesis was tested in a sample of 23 women 68–83 (M = 74.13, SD = 4.70) drawn from the participant pool from the previous study. Same measures for cognitive reserve and cognitive function were used. The mean years between the testing were 3.391 (SD = 0.656). Statistically significant changes were found only in three measures – long-term memory, reaction time composite and clock drawing task. Out of these, only changes in the reaction time were associated with cognitive reserve, specifically – leisure activities, thus only partially confirming the hypothesis. Overall, results indicate that higher cognitive reserve could be associated with better performance in short- and long-term memory, verbal abilities and reaction time even in healthy older adults. Similarly, higher occupational requirements and cognitive reserve as such could also be associated with larger cortical volume in temporal, parietal and frontal regions, thus providing protection against brain atrophy. Finally, changes in cognitive functioning over time, could be associated with active leisure; however, studies in a larger sample are needed.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,014

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,345
Écart entre enseignants0,311 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→Travaux en français237 207→