Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This book examines why the economic decline in Canada in the early 1930s was so severe and the recovery to 1937 so incomplete, both absolutely and relative to our main trading partners.There are several reasons why its re-issue at this time is appropriate.First, there is an intrinsic and growing interest in the Great Depression of the 1930s.In the two-hundred-year recorded history of business fluctuations, no other depression, with the possible exception of one in the late nineteenth century, was as severe or had so many lasting consequences.There has been a surge of publications on the thirties, both popular and academic, in recent decades.In part this interest reflects increasing recognition of the links between business cycles and many developments in macroeconomics and economic growth.There are competing schools of thought in this literature that reflect very different views on the reasons for fluctuations in output and employment.This edition includes an addition to the 1959 bibliography that lists some of the more recent literature for Canada and internationally.From my perspective, particularly significant additions include Bernanke (2000), Betts et.al. (1996), Friedman and Schwartz (1963), Kindleberger (1986), and Temin (1988).Gordon (1990) is an excellent example of the many contributions by the National Bureau of Economic Research.There is also a short summary of work on business cycles generally in Romer (2008).Second, despite all this publication, no other broad study of the Canadian experience, with a focus also on developments in key sectors, has appeared in all these years.Fifty years after its original publication, professors of history and economic history as well as specialists in business cycles, among others, continue to cite it in their research and refer their students to it.Since 1987 the federal Public Lending Right Commission has surveyed annually a number of public and, until recently, university libraries as a basis for compensating Canadian writers for the use of their books in Canada's libraries.This book has always been in all of the libraries surveyed.Third, the underlying theoretical, historical, and quantitative approach of this study seems to have some lasting merit as shown in the conclusions of a very careful theoretical and empirical test of various explanations of the onset, depth and duration of output collapse in Canada and the United States in the 1930s (Betts et.al., 1996).The authors report that "results are consistent with hypotheses such as those of Fisher (1933), Bernstein (1987) and Safarían (1959), that emphasize secular factors in explaining the Depression" (p.35).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,375 | 0,202 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».