Notice bibliographique
Résumé
EnglishICAME conferences are invariably innovatory: new descriptions from new corpora using new techniques.In this regard, ICAME19-98 was no exception, but three new dimension s made it special: widespread use of very large corpora such as the Cobuild Bank of English (BojE) , the British National Corpus (BNC), CD-ROM newspaper corpora, and even the internet (or world- wide web); as a result, the use of corpora for lexical studies; and the development of parsed corpus concordances.No doubt the debate over the relative merits of corpus size versus register balance will continue.But there is certainly merit in pursuing size if, as these papers show, it yields good results.According to Kjellmer, for instance, 'the arrival on the scene of large-scale language corpora has now made it possible for us to register even very marginal variation phenomena in a fairly systematic way, phenomena which may thus be the precursors of changes to come' (this volume: liS).The spoken component of the BofE (currently 325,000,000 words) is used in the paper by Susan Blackwell as a resource of data for discourse uses of three words: honest (on its own, but also its various collocations to be (quite) honest, let's be honest, I'll be (quite) honest, and honest to God), look (especially utterance-initially), and well when tagged as a 'formulaic interactive expression'.A very different use of the BofE features in the theoretical paper by Oliver Mason on the possibilities and techniques for measuring collocations.Mason's purpose is to demonstrate that 'the span for computing a word's collocates can be determined empirically'; to this end, he uses the BofE as a control corpus, and a sample of it for detailed investigation.The BofE is also used by Vincent Ooi to generate examples of words under investigation by him as Asian words.The occurrence of some 'eastern' words in this 'western' corpus may be explained by the BofE' s high newspaper constituency .The Cobuild Direct Corpus (CDC) (50 million words of the BofE available as a CD-ROM) is used by Goran Kjellmer in his study of complements of the lexical verb TRY.He finds that, whereas the TRY + bare infinitive neither occurs in any of the earlier corpora (the Brown Corpus, the Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus and the London-Lund Corpus (LLC) , nor in the Freiburg LOB Corpus (the 1991 equivalent of LOB), there are 47 occurrences in CDC, with most examples coming from 'Australian News' and ' UK Spoken ' sections .Interpreting the behaviour of these data using criteria for auxiliaryhood, Kjellmer conclude s that TRY is beginning to move towards auxiliaryhood status.The main alternative to the BofE is the 100,000,000 word BNe.The webreport hy Lou Burnard http://users.ox.ac.uk/-Ioulreports/9805icame.htmfinds that nearly 20 of the 70 or so papers and posters at the conference made use of BNC data, but this has primarily to do with accessibility and cost, now that the
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,258 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».