Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Children, Youth and Environments Vol. 13 No. 2 (2003) ISSN: 1546-2250 Greening School Grounds: Creating Habitats for Learning Grant, Tim and Littlejohn, Gail (2001). Canada: New Society Publishers; 136 pages. $16.95. ISBN 0865714363. Children spend 20-25 percent of their time inschool in the schoolyard—the equivalent of 257 days by the end of sixthgrade (Grant and Littlejohn, 5). This makes one consider how andwhere children are spending that time. Does the time count? Is itpause, recreation, or education? What kind of education does a childget in an environment that is analogous to a parking lot? Consideringthe current sociopolitical emphasis on academic standards, studentachievement, and high-stakes testing (at least in the United States),could more be done with the space that is typically paved in asphalt tomaximize its educational value? Greening School Grounds: Creating Habitats for Learning is aresource and design guidance manual aimed at supporting teachersthrough the entire process of a schoolyard greening project fromconception through construction, and ultimately to teaching in the newgrounds—unique outdoor learning environments that replace plain asphaltor turf. Written by teachers for teachers, the book presents designersand researchers of children’s environments with insights into theobstacles and opportunities that educators face when putting theoryinto practice. Tim Grant and Gail Littlejohn, the book’s editors, are formerhigh school teachers and also editors of Green Teacher magazine, anonprofit quarterly published in Toronto since 1991. Both the book andmagazine are geared towards “K-12 educators and parents who seek tofoster environmental literacy and global awareness in young people.” While I agree these are important objectives, as a reader and designpractitioner I question whether they will gain broad support from thegeneral public or the school administration? Working with a design firmthat has focused on changing school environments for 30 158 years, we areconstantly faced with how difficult it is to implement changes becausethey require leadership and support at the school and policy level. Greening School Grounds is a well-structured compilation ofshort articles linking the environment with education, written byteachers and environmental educators described in the introduction as“North American pioneers in schoolyard greening” (vi). The bookillustrates through case studies how the transformation of schoolgrounds from bleak expanses of underutilized asphalt or turf intomulti-sensory, natural learning environments cultivates improved socialbehavior, enhances the environment, provides opportunities forlearning, and nurtures an environmental ethic. The editors state that greening schoolyards supports the more“real…broader and deeper” purposes of education than the preparation of“people to compete in a high-tech, global economy” (vi). Contributorsof individual chapters within the book describe from their variousperspectives how this mission can be accomplished in an outdoorclassroom. This book comes at a time when several schoolyard greening initiativesin North America are underway. The first article outlines a history ofschoolyard greening that spans 150 years. The movement resurfaced mostrecently in Britain in the 1980s as the Learning Through Landscapesprogram and since then, schoolyard greening programs have been on therise. Though these programs face pressures of budget cuts and anacademic climate (in the U.S.) that measures student achievementthrough standardized tests, teacher and parent groups are taking thetransformation of school grounds into their own hands as a way toachieve broader child development and educational goals they feel arelacking in schools today. The book acts as both a reference work with sections on a variety oftopics, and as a “how to” book that, if followed from start to finish,offers a plan of action for implementing a greening project. The eightsections in the book are set in a good sequence, from a generaloverview of the basic views of the benefits of greening school grounds(such as improving behavior, as a supplemental teaching tool, anddeveloping an environmental ethic) to specific 159 examples of design orspecific actions one can take to accomplish a greening project. Thetopics are well-selected and relevant to each phase of the project. The “Getting Started” chapter describes important factors forsuccess—getting the right people involved, funding the projects,publicity, planning, strategies, and educational value. Another chapteroffers examples of schools that have developed entire ecosystems suchas natural wetlands, desert gardens, and prairie restoration. Articlesin the “Attracting Wildlife” chapter offer project ideas on how toincrease a school ground’s learning potential by attracting...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».