MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4378605336 · doi:10.1353/cye.2003.0049

Greening School Grounds: Creating Habitats for Learning

2003· article· en· W4378605336 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jennifer Worth

Notice bibliographique

RevueChildren Youth and Environments · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEducational Environments and Student Outcomes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRecreationSpace (punctuation)LiteracySociologyPedagogyPolitical scienceLawComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Children, Youth and Environments Vol. 13 No. 2 (2003) ISSN: 1546-2250 Greening School Grounds: Creating Habitats for Learning Grant, Tim and Littlejohn, Gail (2001). Canada: New Society Publishers; 136 pages. $16.95. ISBN 0865714363. Children spend 20-25 percent of their time inschool in the schoolyard—the equivalent of 257 days by the end of sixthgrade (Grant and Littlejohn, 5). This makes one consider how andwhere children are spending that time. Does the time count? Is itpause, recreation, or education? What kind of education does a childget in an environment that is analogous to a parking lot? Consideringthe current sociopolitical emphasis on academic standards, studentachievement, and high-stakes testing (at least in the United States),could more be done with the space that is typically paved in asphalt tomaximize its educational value? Greening School Grounds: Creating Habitats for Learning is aresource and design guidance manual aimed at supporting teachersthrough the entire process of a schoolyard greening project fromconception through construction, and ultimately to teaching in the newgrounds—unique outdoor learning environments that replace plain asphaltor turf. Written by teachers for teachers, the book presents designersand researchers of children’s environments with insights into theobstacles and opportunities that educators face when putting theoryinto practice. Tim Grant and Gail Littlejohn, the book’s editors, are formerhigh school teachers and also editors of Green Teacher magazine, anonprofit quarterly published in Toronto since 1991. Both the book andmagazine are geared towards “K-12 educators and parents who seek tofoster environmental literacy and global awareness in young people.” While I agree these are important objectives, as a reader and designpractitioner I question whether they will gain broad support from thegeneral public or the school administration? Working with a design firmthat has focused on changing school environments for 30 158 years, we areconstantly faced with how difficult it is to implement changes becausethey require leadership and support at the school and policy level. Greening School Grounds is a well-structured compilation ofshort articles linking the environment with education, written byteachers and environmental educators described in the introduction as“North American pioneers in schoolyard greening” (vi). The bookillustrates through case studies how the transformation of schoolgrounds from bleak expanses of underutilized asphalt or turf intomulti-sensory, natural learning environments cultivates improved socialbehavior, enhances the environment, provides opportunities forlearning, and nurtures an environmental ethic. The editors state that greening schoolyards supports the more“real…broader and deeper” purposes of education than the preparation of“people to compete in a high-tech, global economy” (vi). Contributorsof individual chapters within the book describe from their variousperspectives how this mission can be accomplished in an outdoorclassroom. This book comes at a time when several schoolyard greening initiativesin North America are underway. The first article outlines a history ofschoolyard greening that spans 150 years. The movement resurfaced mostrecently in Britain in the 1980s as the Learning Through Landscapesprogram and since then, schoolyard greening programs have been on therise. Though these programs face pressures of budget cuts and anacademic climate (in the U.S.) that measures student achievementthrough standardized tests, teacher and parent groups are taking thetransformation of school grounds into their own hands as a way toachieve broader child development and educational goals they feel arelacking in schools today. The book acts as both a reference work with sections on a variety oftopics, and as a “how to” book that, if followed from start to finish,offers a plan of action for implementing a greening project. The eightsections in the book are set in a good sequence, from a generaloverview of the basic views of the benefits of greening school grounds(such as improving behavior, as a supplemental teaching tool, anddeveloping an environmental ethic) to specific 159 examples of design orspecific actions one can take to accomplish a greening project. Thetopics are well-selected and relevant to each phase of the project. The “Getting Started” chapter describes important factors forsuccess—getting the right people involved, funding the projects,publicity, planning, strategies, and educational value. Another chapteroffers examples of schools that have developed entire ecosystems suchas natural wetlands, desert gardens, and prairie restoration. Articlesin the “Attracting Wildlife” chapter offer project ideas on how toincrease a school ground’s learning potential by attracting...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,028
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,906

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,281
Écart entre enseignants0,260 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueChildren Youth and EnvironmentsMême sujetEducational Environments and Student OutcomesTravaux en français237 207