Normal sympathetic neural but blunted cardiovascular responses during static handgrip exercise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Exercise intolerance is a hallmark of heart failure, which significantly impacts activities of daily living and quality of life. In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, exercise intolerance is associated with sympathetic nervous system hyperactivity during exercise. Whether this is also true in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unknown. Therefore, we hypothesized that patients with HFpEF would have augmented sympathetic neural responses to exercise. Methods: Thirty-four patients with HFpEF (19 women, 70±7 [SD] yrs) and 24 age-matched healthy controls (14 women, 70±6 yrs) were studied. Mean arterial pressure (MAP; finger photoplethysmography calibrated with brachial blood pressure [BP]), heart rate (HR; lead II electrocardiogram), cardiac output (CO; derived from the Windkessel model), total peripheral resistance (TPR=MAP/CO), and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA, microneurography) were measured during 3 min of supine baseline, static handgrip (SHG) exercise at 40% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force until fatigue, and 2 min of post-exercise circulatory arrest (PECA). Sympathetic transduction was estimated using diastolic BP divided by MSNA burst incidence. Results: Patients with HFpEF had a smaller MVC (24±8 vs. 30±9 kg, P=0.020) and a shorter time to fatigue during SHG (162±67 vs. 210±80 sec, P=0.012) than controls. However, there were consistent results across subgroups analyzed according to matched MVC or time to fatigue during SHG. Baseline MSNA burst frequency was higher in HFpEF patients compared with controls (36±16 vs. 24±13 bursts/min, P=0.005); however, there were no differences in MSNA responses (Δ) to SHG and PECA between the groups (SHG peak: 19±14 in HFpEF vs. 19±12 bursts/min in controls, P=0.984; PECA: 8±13 vs. 6±7 bursts/minute, P=0.596). Increases in MAP, HR, and TPR from baseline to peak SHG were smaller in patients with HFpEF than in controls (all P<0.05), while the increase in CO was not different between the groups ( P=0.101). In contrast, ΔMAP, ΔHR and ΔCO from baseline to PECA were not different between the groups (all P>0.05), but ΔTPR remained lower in patients with HFpEF than controls ( P=0.023). The transduction of MSNA burst incidence into diastolic BP was lower in patients with HFpEF compared with controls throughout data collection ( P=0.010). Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, patients with HFpEF have normal sympathetic neural reactivity during SHG exercise despite a higher baseline. The blunted pressor response may be attributed to impaired sympathetic transduction to stress rather than a change in sympathetic neural responsiveness during exercise in HFpEF. Supported by the National Institutes of Health (P01HL137630 and R01HL091078) This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».