Voluntary wheel running and lithium supplementation improves muscle force production without altering SERCA function in the D2 mdx mouse
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked recessive muscle wasting disease that, with no cure, leads to early mortality (30-40 years of age). Previous studies have shown that voluntary wheel running can mitigate disease pathology and improve muscle contractility in the preclinical mdx mouse model. We have shown that treating wild-type (WT) mice with a low dose of lithium, a natural inhibitor of glycogen synthase kinase 3, enhanced soleus (SOL) and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle contractility. Our objectives were to test our hypothesis of whether combining VWR with low dose lithium supplementation could provide further benefits to muscle contractility in DBA/2J mdx mice – a model that displays far worse disease severity compared with the traditional C57BL/10 mdx mouse. We also examined if this combined intervention could improve muscle calcium regulation in muscle by assessing sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca 2+ -ATPase (SERCA) function as we have recently shown that SERCA function is drastically impaired in D2 mdx mice, which could also contribute to deficits in muscle force production. Methods: Young (5-6 week old) male D2 WT and mdx mice were ordered from Jackson Laboratory. D2 mdx mice were assigned into each of the following conditions: sedentary ( mdxSED), voluntary wheel running ( mdxVWR), or VWR+lithium chloride ( mdxVWR+Li). The VWR groups were given access to a cagewheel for a total of 6 weeks, and the mdxVWR+Li group were provided a low dose of LiCl (50 mg/kg/day) via drinking water for the entire duration of the study. After 6 weeks, all mice were euthanized and the SOL and EDL muscles were subjected to force-frequency curve analysis (1-160 Hz). SERCA function was assessed by performing SERCA activity assays and a Ca 2+ uptake assay. Results: In the SOL, the combined effect of lithium and VWR improved specific force production to near WT levels across submaximal and maximal frequencies. Specific force production in the mdxVWR+Li group was significantly greater compared to the mdxSED group at all stimulation frequencies. Rate of SOL force development was significantly lower in all mdx groups compared to WT. However, rate of relaxation was only significantly reduced (vs. WT) within the mdxSED group, suggesting that VWR and VWR+Li improved relaxation. This could not be explained by any changes in SERCA function. In the EDL, specific force was significantly (p<0.001) reduced across mdx groups compared to WT; however, of all mdx groups, the mdxVWR+Li produced the most force and was significantly different compared to mdxVWR at 80 and 160 Hz. Rates of force development and relaxation were all slower in all mdx groups compared to WT, and there were no differences in SERCA activity. Conclusions: Combining lithium supplementation with VWR improved SOL and EDL force production in the D2 mdx mouse without any changes to SERCA function. V.A.F is a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Muscle Plasticity and Tissue-Remodelling. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2023 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».