Abstract 3: Adapting a Tobacco Cessation Treatment Intervention and Implementation Strategies to Enhance Implementation Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes in the Context of HIV Care in Viet Nam: A Case Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Purpose: In Vietnam, tobacco use among men living with HIV/AIDS (PLWH) is substantially higher than among the general population. Tobacco use is responsible for significant disparities in cancer-related health outcomes among PLWH who smoke compared with nonsmokers. Despite the burden of disease, there is a lack of evidence for effective treatment for PLWH. We conducted a randomized-controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of three tobacco cessation interventions among PLWH receiving care in HIV outpatient clinics (OPCs). Methods: Patients identified as current cigarette and dual use smokers at the time of their visit (waterpipe and cigarettes) (n=288) were recruited and randomized into one of three interventions: 1) 3As (Ask about tobacco use, Advise to quit, Assist with brief counseling delivered by physicians)+R (proactively Refer to Vietnam’s National Smoker’s Quitline); 2) 3As+Counsel (6-session counseling intervention tailored to PLWH and delivered by trained nurses); and 3) 3As+Counsel+N (nicotine replacement therapy). The primary outcome is six-month carbon monoxide-confirmed smoking abstinence. We are also assessing hypothesized mediators (e.g., self-efficacy, social support). A formative assessment guided adaptation of the intervention to the local context and population. Results: Mean age was 42.4, 96% of patient were male, 8% live alone, 91% are employed, 53.8% were dual users, mean # cigarettes smoked per day was 15.9, and 21.9% reported drug use in the past 3 months. There were no differences across arms in baseline rates of clinical depression or substance use. At 3 months (n=211, those eligible to date), 45% in Arm 1 and 2, and 43.5% in Arm 3, reported smoking abstinence. Among those eligible and reached (98%) for the 6-month survey, 35.9%, 28.9% and 38.3% reported abstinence respectively. Six-month CO- confirmed quit rates were 15.1, 13.3 and 21.3% respectively. 91% of patient received at least one Quitline call and 94% completed 6 sessions of counseling. Discussion: Results are promising and indicate that smoking cessation interventions adapted for PLWH and delivered by health care providers as part of routine care can be effective. The study is the first to demonstrate the feasibility of integrating a Quitline referral system in the context of HIV care. Therefore, the similar outcome across arms has important policy implications; the Quitline is a sustainable resource requiring fewer OPC resources than more intensive counseling. Citation Format: Donna Shelley, Mari Armstrong-Hough, Lloyd Goldsamt, Gloria Guevera Alvarez, Trang Nguyen, Nam Nguyen. Adapting a Tobacco Cessation Treatment Intervention and Implementation Strategies to Enhance Implementation Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes in the Context of HIV Care in Viet Nam: A Case Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Symposium on Global Cancer Research; Closing the Research-to-Implementation Gap; 2023 Apr 4-6. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».