Association of sarcopenia and treatment tolerability in older adults with advanced cancer: Secondary analysis of a nationwide NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) randomized clinical trial.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
12038 Background: Sarcopenia (sarc) is defined by reduced muscle function paired with low muscle mass or quality. Sarc is common in older adults, but the relationship between sarc and treatment tolerability in older patients (pts) with cancer has not been established. This secondary analysis of our nationwide University of Rochester NCORP Research Base randomized trial examines whether pre-treatment sarc was associated with treatment toxicity and survival in older pts with advanced cancers. Methods: Pts aged 70 and older with incurable solid tumors and lymphoma initiating a new high-risk systemic treatment were enrolled in GAP70+ (NCT02054741). GAP70+ was a cluster randomized trial evaluating whether a geriatric assessment intervention can reduce cancer treatment toxicity. This secondary analysis included 161 pts with baseline computed tomography (CT) scans and physical function testing. Sarc was defined as low muscle strength (5-time Chair Stand Test > 16.7 seconds) with reduced muscle mass (BMI and sex-specific cutoffs, cm/m2) or low muscle quality (Hounsfield units [HU] average radiodensity thresholds) utilizing validated cross-sectional CT imaging metrics. Sarc was defined as severe in presence of reduced physical performance (Timed-Up-And-Go > 13.5 seconds). We evaluated if the proportion of pts experiencing any grade 3-5 toxicity in the first 3 months of treatment using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) V4.0 was higher in those with sarc than those without sarc. Multivariate logistic regression was used to further explore this relationship. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association of sarc and severe sarc with 1-year survival. Results: Mean age of the 161 participants included in this cohort was 76.6 years and 60.9% of were male; over half had gastrointestinal (34.8%) or lung cancer (23.6%). Sarc was found in 91 of 161 (56.5%) pts; 54 had severe sarc. Pts with sarc did not experience significantly more grade 3-5 toxicity compared to those without sarc (79.1% vs. 71.4%, p = 0.26). However, pts with sarc experienced more grade 3-5 non-hematologic toxicity (63.7% vs. 44.3%, p = 0.01) on univariate and multivariate analysis (OR 2.2, CI 1.1-4.5, p = 0.02). The association between sarc and worse survival at 1-year was not statistically significant (OR 1.5, CI 0.9-2.4, p = 0.13). Those with severe sarc did demonstrate significantly worse 1-year survival on multivariate analysis (HR 1.8, CI 1.1-2.9, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Older pts with cancer and sarc were more likely to suffer serious non-hematologic toxicity from cancer treatment. Furthermore, those with severe sarc had significantly worse survival. Evaluation for sarc before initiating treatment in older adults could help oncologists identify pts at higher risk of toxicity and poor survival. Clinical trial information: NCT02054741 .
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».